FR 2025-05018

Overview

Title

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences is having a meeting where people will talk about how the environment affects our health. Some parts of the meeting can be watched online by anyone, but other parts are private because they talk about secret things.

Summary AI

The National Advisory Environmental Health Sciences Council is holding a meeting on June 5, 2025, at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in Research Triangle Park, NC, which will also be accessible virtually. The morning session, open to the public, includes discussions on topics such as environmental exposures and gut-brain signaling. The afternoon session will be closed to the public because it will involve reviewing grant applications and discussing sensitive information. Individuals interested in attending or providing comments are encouraged to contact Dr. David M. Balshaw.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 13604
Document #: 2025-05018
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 13604-13604

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The document is an official notice about an upcoming meeting of the National Advisory Environmental Health Sciences Council, scheduled for June 5, 2025. This meeting will take place at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences located in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and will also be accessible virtually. The meeting is organized into two parts: a morning session open to the public and an afternoon session closed to the public. Topics in the open session will include the impact of environmental exposures on health, and the closed session will focus on reviewing grant applications containing sensitive information.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues with the document merit attention:

  1. Lack of Detailed Justifications for Closed Sessions: While the notice mentions that the closed session may involve discussions of confidential trade secrets or personal information, it does not provide specific justifications for closing these sessions beyond citing general legal provisions. This lack of detail might cause skepticism among stakeholders concerned about transparency.

  2. Vague Accommodations Process: The notice fails to outline specific instructions or deadlines for attendees needing special assistance. Providing this information would help ensure accessibility for all potential participants, particularly those requiring accommodations.

  3. Virtual Platform Unspecified: The document does not specify which virtual platform will be used for remote participation. This omission could cause confusion and accessibility issues for attendees who wish to join the meeting online.

  4. Complex Language Usage: The language used throughout the document is formal and may be difficult for readers without a legal or governmental background to understand fully. Simplifying the language would make the document more accessible to the general public.

  5. Absence of Direct Links to Resources: While the document references several external resources, such as the NIH and NIEHS websites, it does not provide direct hyperlinks. This oversight could inconvenience readers trying to access more detailed information.

Impact on the Public

The document informs the public about a meeting where issues related to environmental health will be discussed, highlighting the importance of public awareness and participation in environmental health matters. The provision for virtual attendance potentially increases accessibility, allowing a broader audience to engage with the content discussed at the meeting.

However, the lack of clear instructions and details regarding special accommodations and virtual access could limit participation, particularly for those who might face difficulties attending in person or who require additional support.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders such as environmental health researchers, grant applicants, and those with vested interests in environmental health policies will find this meeting particularly relevant. The discussions and decisions made could have a direct impact on funding, research directions, and collaborations in the field of environmental health.

Conversely, the confidentiality of the closed session may raise concerns among stakeholders advocating for transparency in public funding and research discussions. Clearer communication and justification of closed sessions would be beneficial in addressing these concerns.

Overall, while the advisory meeting addresses significant environmental health issues, improvements to the document's accessibility and transparency could enhance its efficacy and impact significantly.

Issues

  • • The document mentions closed meetings that could discuss confidential trade secrets or commercial property, but provides no clear policy or justification for what specifically qualifies these discussions to be closed beyond the general legal provisions cited.

  • • The notice does not provide specific instructions or deadlines for notifying the Contact Person about the need for special assistance, which could be helpful for attendees requiring accommodations.

  • • The document does not specify the virtual meeting platform, which could make it difficult for attendees to know how to access the meeting.

  • • The language used in the document is quite formal and may be challenging for individuals without a background in government or legal documents to understand thoroughly.

  • • The document includes references to external resources, such as NIH and NIEHS websites, but does not provide direct links, which may cause inconvenience for readers trying to access more information.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 708
Sentences: 24
Entities: 64

Language

Nouns: 274
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 24
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.53
Average Sentence Length:
29.50
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
22.75

Reading Time

about 2 minutes