Overview
Title
Amendment of Rural Development Funding Opportunities Pursuant to the Executive Order “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing”; Correction of Rural Energy for America Funding Notice
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The USDA is changing how they give out money to help rural areas by not using some old rules and ideas that focused on fairness and diversity, following new instructions from the government. They also fixed a mistake about money info for a program that helps with energy projects in rural areas.
Summary AI
The United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Development (RD) division is changing its funding opportunities to remove references to the previous Administration's key priorities and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) criteria. This update follows an Executive Order titled "Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing," issued in January 2025. Programs affected by this change will no longer consider these previous criteria for application scoring. Additionally, the Rural Energy for America Program's funding notice is corrected to include $50 million from the 2018 Farm Bill that was previously omitted.
Abstract
The United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development (RD), which is comprised of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBCS), Rural Utilities Service (RUS), and Rural Housing Service (RHS), announces that it is amending 14 program funding opportunities to remove references to the prior Administration's key priorities and DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion)-related scoring criteria to bring them into compliance with the Executive Order, "Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing", issued on January 20, 2025. This notice also confirms that previous Administration key priorities and discretionary points will not be considered during application scoring and makes clear that applicants who already have applied need not reapply. This notice also corrects the Rural Energy for America funding notice to include an omitted funding source.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Commentary on the USDA's Amendment of Rural Development Funding Opportunities
In March 2025, the United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Development (RD) division issued a notice amending its funding opportunities. This action is part of compliance with an Executive Order aimed at ending government programs considered radical or wasteful, particularly those focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This move signifies a shift away from criteria previously used to award additional points to certain projects, consequently impacting the scoring of rural development applications.
Summary of the Document
The announcement indicates that 14 funding programs within the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Rural Utilities Service, and Rural Housing Service will no longer use DEI-related criteria or consider prior Administration's key priorities in decision-making. Additionally, the document corrects the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) funding notice to include $50 million from the 2018 Farm Bill, a funding source omitted in prior communications.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several issues arise from the USDA's recent amendments. Notably, the removal of DEI and previous Administration’s priorities might undermine efforts to promote diversity and equitable resource distribution across rural communities. By discontinuing the prioritization of disadvantaged or distressed areas, this policy may inadvertently neglect communities that are in more significant need of support.
Moreover, the notice is vague regarding which specific funding opportunities are impacted, using the phrase "14 program funding opportunities" without further elaboration. This lack of clarity could generate confusion among applicants and stakeholders who must discern whether their particular programs are affected.
Technical language within the document presents another concern. It references indices and tools such as the Social Vulnerability Index and the Distressed Communities Index without explanation, which may not be accessible to all stakeholders, particularly those with less technical expertise.
Additionally, the late correction regarding the Farm Bill funding for REAP might confuse stakeholders. Those previously applying under the assumption that the Farm Bill funds were unavailable may not have optimized their applications accordingly.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The broader public could witness a shift in how rural development projects are promoted and prioritized. With DEI criteria de-emphasized, there is a potential risk of perpetuating existing social and economic inequities in rural areas.
Specific stakeholders—including rural communities that previously benefited from DEI considerations or those in distressed regions—might find fewer opportunities for gaining essential funding and support. Conversely, other stakeholders might appreciate an alignment with the current Administration’s new priorities.
Lastly, applicants to the Rural Energy for America Program might receive welcome news about the additional $50 million in funding from the Farm Bill, though the delayed communication of this detail may require some to revisit their strategies.
Conclusion
The USDA's recent modifications to rural development funding criteria and the correction of the REAP funding notice represent significant shifts that warrant careful consideration by potential applicants. While aiming to streamline government programs, these changes could potentially impact the communities that once benefited from DEI considerations, highlighting an ongoing debate around the most effective way to support rural America. The USDA has a crucial role in ensuring clarity and fairness in its funding processes, particularly against the backdrop of these updates.
Financial Assessment
The document released by the United States Department of Agriculture, specifically the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Rural Housing Service, and Rural Utilities Service, details amendments to several program funding opportunities. These amendments are made to align with a recent executive order aimed at eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations, as well as the previous Administration’s key priorities, from federal funding programs.
Financial Allocations and Summary
A key financial detail noted in the document involves the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP). Initially announced in the Federal Register on October 16, 2024, the notice omitted the availability of funding from the 2018 Farm Bill. The newly revised statement confirms the addition of approximately $50 million per Federal fiscal year sourced from Farm Bill funding. This correction is critical in informing stakeholders of the available funds that they might not have initially considered when the funding opportunity was first announced.
Relation to Identified Issues
The inclusion of the Farm Bill funding carries significant weight in addressing some of the document's issues:
DEI and Priority Criteria Removal: By eliminating DEI-focused criteria and the previous Administration's priorities from the funding considerations, there is a concern that disadvantaged or distressed rural communities might be overlooked. The Farm Bill funding, however, represents an additional financial resource that could potentially offset these concerns by providing support that is not contingent on the now-removed criteria.
Potential Resource Imbalance: The financial appropriation from the Farm Bill might help mitigate issues of resource distribution imbalances that result from the amendments. By knowing there is a specific pool of $50 million per Federal fiscal year available, applicants could strategize how to pursue these funds to support equitable development goals, despite the lack of DEI focus.
Correction and Clarity: The explicit mention of the Farm Bill funding corrects previous omissions, which might have led to confusion among stakeholders who were unaware of this source. Properly informing potential applicants of the availability of these funds is crucial for transparent and effective application processes, and may alleviate misunderstandings regarding the overall budget scope of the REAP.
Overall, while the removal of DEI and priority point criteria raises several concerns, the notification and clarification regarding Farm Bill funding could provide a compensatory mechanism to support applicants facing the current changes in funding evaluations. By clearly listing the $50 million per Federal fiscal year allocation, the amendment ensures that those interested in REAP have a correct understanding of available financial resources.
Issues
• The document removes DEI-related scoring criteria from funding opportunities in compliance with an executive order, which may disregard the benefits of these criteria in promoting diversity and inclusion in rural development projects.
• The removal of DEI and previous Administration's key priorities could lead to a potential imbalance in resource distribution, possibly neglecting disadvantaged or distressed rural communities.
• The document does not clearly outline which specific funding opportunities are impacted by these changes, only stating '14 program funding opportunities' without listing them in the text. This could cause confusion for stakeholders.
• Some of the language in the document is technical, referencing specific tools and indices (e.g., Social Vulnerability Index, Distressed Communities Index) without further explanation, which may not be easily understood by all stakeholders.
• The correction of the Rural Energy for America Program funding notice to include Farm Bill funding could cause confusion if stakeholders were unaware of this funding source's availability from the start.