Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
FERC is looking at how some companies handle their gas pipelines and prices. Greylock wants to stop using its current rules, while Great Basin and Kern River are changing how they charge for gas. People can say if they like these changes or not by the end of March 2025.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced the receipt of filings related to natural gas pipeline rate and refund reports. Greylock Pipeline, LLC filed a tariff amendment to cancel their entire tariff, effective March 17, 2025, while Great Basin Gas Transmission Company submitted a rate filing involving non-conforming service agreements, effective April 1, 2025. Additionally, Kern River Gas Transmission Company filed a compliance report to be effective August 1, 2025. Interested parties can intervene or protest these filings by following FERC's specified procedures by March 31, 2025.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice concerning several filings related to natural gas pipelines. Companies involved include Greylock Pipeline, LLC; Great Basin Gas Transmission Company; and Kern River Gas Transmission Company. Each filing has specific implications, such as tariff cancellations and the introduction of new rate filings.
General Summary
FERC's notice discusses three main filings. Greylock Pipeline, LLC intends to cancel their entire tariff, effective March 17, 2025. Great Basin Gas Transmission Company proposes a rate filing involving specific service agreements to begin on April 1, 2025. Lastly, Kern River Gas Transmission Company submitted a compliance filing, set to take effect in August 2025. Comments or objections to these filings should be submitted by March 31, 2025.
Significant Issues or Concerns
Several issues are noteworthy. Firstly, the document's metadata lacks an abstract that could quickly inform readers about the document's purpose. Instead, specific regulatory references might confuse those unfamiliar with such language. This document assumes a level of understanding about FERC processes that the average person might not possess. Additionally, it is not clear what cancelling the whole tariff means for stakeholders involved with Greylock Pipeline, LLC.
Public Impact
The broader public might encounter difficulty understanding and engaging with these filings due to the technical and regulatory language used. Those affected include landowners, consumers, and business stakeholders reliant on natural gas services. The Office of Public Participation (OPP) is available to assist the public, but the document does not specify how it can assist each type of inquiry, which could restrict effective public involvement.
Impact on Stakeholders
For stakeholders like Greylock Pipeline's users, the cancellation of their tariff could signify considerable changes that might affect service terms or costs. Similarly, the rate filing by Great Basin Gas Transmission may alter the financial landscape for customers tied to those service agreements. Companies involved in these filings must navigate compliance while ensuring their stakeholders are informed and satisfied. The impact on the public could be seen through potential shifts in natural gas pricing or availability, depending on the outcomes of these filings.
In summary, while the FERC document provides essential procedural information, it can create barriers for public understanding due to its technical nature. There is a need for clearer language and definitions to facilitate wider comprehension and participation from all interested parties.
Issues
• The document lacks an abstract in the metadata, which might help users quickly understand the document's purpose.
• The document uses technical language and references to specific regulations (e.g., 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, or 385.206) that could be difficult for non-experts to understand without additional context.
• There is no clear explanation of the implications of the 'Cancellation of whole tariff' for Greylock Pipeline, LLC. This could lead to confusion or misinterpretation by stakeholders.
• The document assumes familiarity with FERC processes and terms, such as 'intervention' and 'protest,' but does not provide detailed definitions or context for these actions. This could make it challenging for laypersons to participate effectively.
• Contact information for the Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) is provided, but no details on how OPP specifically assists with each type of public inquiry are mentioned, potentially limiting understanding of their role.