FR 2025-04877

The Federal Register recently published a notice concerning an Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) application submitted by Atlantic Capes Fisheries, Inc., in collaboration with Rutgers University. This exemption seeks to allow certain fishing vessels to catch and retain both surfclams and ocean quahogs on the same voyage—a practice that is currently prohibited by fishery regulations. The intent is to conduct research on estimating the mixing and discard rates of these species while at sea, with findings potentially influencing future fishery management policies.

General Summary

The document outlines the proposal for new fishing practices intended to address the challenge of surfclams moving into deeper waters traditionally occupied by ocean quahogs. Atlantic Capes Fisheries and Rutgers University plan to develop and test new protocols for estimating mixed catches and discards. The opportunity for public input is invited, with comments required by April 7, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A few key concerns arise from the notice:

1. Budget Transparency: The notice lacks explicit details about the cost implications or budget provisions for executing these exempted fishing activities. This absence may point to a potential oversight in fiscal planning or transparency. The public and stakeholders might want to understand how the research is financed and the extent of financial resources committed to it.

2. Selection of Partners: While the collaboration between Atlantic Capes Fisheries and Rutgers University is mentioned, the criteria for partner selection are not detailed. This omission could raise questions regarding transparency in the selection process and whether there are any potential biases or preferential treatment.

3. Technical Language: The document uses technical jargon, particularly concerning the methodology for collecting and comparing independent estimates of mixed catches. This complexity might pose difficulties for those without a scientific background to fully comprehend the research objectives and methodologies.

4. Ambiguity in Modification Procedures: The process for modifying and extending the EFP raises potential concerns. The document states that adjustments may be made without further public notice, which may limit public oversight and input on significant changes.

Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact: The research may impact the general public by informing future regulatory changes that could affect seafood availability and rates. If successful, this initiative could lead to more sustainable fishing practices, ultimately benefiting consumers who prefer seafood sourced from sustainably managed fisheries.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders:

• Fishing Industry: Stakeholders within the fishing industry, particularly those targeting surfclams and ocean quahogs, could experience operational changes. If the protocols prove successful, there could be more flexibility in managing mixed catches, possibly leading to increased efficiency and profitability.

• Regulatory Bodies: Agencies like the National Marine Fisheries Service and other oversight bodies may benefit from refined data and methodologies, assisting in crafting more nuanced fishery management plans.

• Environmental Advocates: Environmental groups may express concern over the lack of public engagement in potential EFP modifications. While the research could benefit sustainable practices, the ability to change EFP terms without further notice may be seen as bypassing critical environmental scrutiny.

In conclusion, while the notice outlines a proactive research initiative with the potential to positively affect fisheries management, it also opens discussions about governmental transparency, public engagement, and stakeholder inclusion in shaping sustainable fishing practices.