Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government is looking at new rules about how much money people pay for gas pipelines and if they might get some money back. Two companies asked for changes, and now people can say what they think about these changes.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has announced new filings regarding natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. Rocky Mountain Natural Gas LLC has submitted a rate filing to reflect changes effective January 1, 2025, and Golden Pass Pipeline LLC has filed a petition for settlement approval. Interested parties must submit interventions or protests by the specified comment dates to participate in the proceedings. The filings can be accessed via the Commission's eLibrary system, and the Office of Public Participation is available to assist the public in engaging with the process.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document titled "Combined Notice of Filings," issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), outlines recent filings regarding natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. This notice primarily provides information about two specific filings: one from Rocky Mountain Natural Gas LLC, which reflects rate changes effective from January 1, 2025, and another from Golden Pass Pipeline LLC, which seeks approval for a settlement. These filings are part of the regulatory processes FERC oversees to ensure fair practices in the energy sector.
General Summary
The notice informs the public about the new filings on natural gas pipeline rates by two major players: Rocky Mountain Natural Gas LLC and Golden Pass Pipeline LLC. For Rocky Mountain, the filing details a change in their service operating conditions effective at the start of 2025, while Golden Pass has submitted a petition for the approval of a settlement. Interested parties wishing to participate in the proceedings, possibly to object or support these filings, must do so by specific deadlines. The notice also encourages the use of FERC’s eLibrary system for those seeking more detailed information about these filings.
Significant Issues and Concerns
A notable issue with this document is the absence of an abstract, leaving the reader without a concise summary upfront. The document also lacks in-depth details about the filings beyond brief descriptions and docket numbers. This makes it challenging for a layperson to grasp the potential implications of these changes. The references to specific regulatory rules without explanations further complicate understanding for individuals not versed in legal or regulatory matters. Additionally, the reliance on hyperlinks for more information could be a hindrance to those accessing printed or non-digital formats, potentially excluding some members of the public.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the document highlights procedural aspects of energy regulation that may lead to changes in natural gas rates, affecting consumers indirectly through potential adjustments in service costs. The contents of these filings could impact residential, commercial, and industrial consumers relying on these pipelines for energy supply. Understanding the changes in rates is crucial as it may influence utility bills and operational costs for businesses.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as landowners, community organizations, and tribal members, this document and its associated filings can have significant implications. Changes in pipeline operations, rates, or settlements could affect land use, environmental factors, and local economies. Businesses using natural gas as a primary energy source could experience changes in operational costs. Energy companies, investors, and market analysts are also key stakeholders who might utilize this document to forecast financial performance and strategic planning.
The FERC’s Office of Public Participation (OPP) offers support in understanding and engaging with these proceedings, which is a positive aspect for stakeholders who may find these processes daunting. By contacting the OPP, stakeholders can better navigate the regulatory landscape and ensure their voices and concerns are considered in these important decisions.
Issues
• The document does not have an abstract, which might make it harder for readers to quickly understand the scope and purpose of the filings.
• The Notice does not provide specific information about the contents of the filings, other than the docket numbers and descriptions. More detailed descriptions would help the public understand the implications of the filings.
• The language assumes familiarity with specific regulations (e.g., Rules 211, 214, 206 of the Commission's Regulations) without explaining them, which could be difficult for the general public to understand.
• The document uses technical terms and references specific legal regulations without simplification or further explanation, which may be challenging for non-experts.
• The URLs provided are functional but rely on hyperlinks alone, which might not be accessible to all users relying on printed documents or non-digital formats.