FR 2025-04841

Overview

Title

Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Transportation Project in Florida

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government has decided to rebuild two old bridges in Florida to make them better and safer, and people have until August 18, 2025, to say if they have any problems with the plan.

Summary AI

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), on behalf of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), has announced final actions for a transportation project involving the replacement of two bridges along S.R. 5/U.S. 1 over Pellicer Creek in Florida. These actions include necessary approvals and permits for the bridge and roadway improvements required for the project. The public has until August 18, 2025, to file any legal claims challenging these decisions. The project documents and approvals are available online or through the FDOT's Office of Environmental Management.

Abstract

The FHWA, on behalf of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), is issuing this notice to announce actions taken by FDOT and other Federal Agencies that are final agency actions. These actions relate to the proposed State Road (S.R.) 5/U.S. 1 Over Pellicer Creek Bridge Replacement Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study (Financial Management Number 447118-1). The project consists of replacing the parallel bridges at S.R. 5/U.S. 1 over Pellicer Creek (Existing Bridge Numbers 730008 and 730045) in Flagler (City of Palm Coast) and St. Johns Counties, Florida, and includes the necessary roadway and drainage elements to provide transitions to the existing roadway and drainage systems. These actions grant licenses, permits, or approvals for the project.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 13400
Document #: 2025-04841
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 13400-13401

AnalysisAI

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), acting on behalf of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), has issued a notice regarding final actions related to a significant infrastructure project in Florida. This project involves the replacement of two bridges along State Road 5/U.S. 1 over Pellicer Creek, affecting areas in Flagler and St. Johns Counties. The project is essential for ensuring safe and improved roadway conditions, with necessary approvals and permits having been granted. Interested parties have until August 18, 2025, to file any legal claims challenging these decisions.

General Summary

The notice gives an update on the final actions undertaken for the bridge replacement project, highlighting the approvals needed for construction to move forward. In essence, this action moves the project into a phase where construction work can commence, subject to the legal timeline for filing claims. The document details various legal and regulatory statutes under which these approvals were granted, ensuring compliance with numerous federal requirements.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the document's lack of detailed budgetary specifics, which impedes a comprehensive evaluation of project costs and prevents an analysis of potential wasteful spending. This absence raises questions about fiscal transparency and accountability, particularly in public infrastructure projects where public funds are at stake.

There are also no mentions of particular organizations or entities that might directly benefit from the project, leaving room for speculation about possible favoritism or lack of transparency in stakeholder benefits. Furthermore, the use of legal jargon and numerous acronyms without simple explanations makes the document challenging for non-experts to fully understand, which could hinder effective public engagement.

Another visible omission is the absence of a public comment period or discussion of stakeholder engagement. In major transportation projects, it is crucial to involve the community and consider public opinion, and the lack of this in the documentation could potentially alienate the stakeholders who are directly affected by these developments.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this project is likely to improve transportation infrastructure by enhancing safety and reliability on a key road network. It may lead to more efficient traffic flow and potentially reduce travel times, thereby benefitting daily commuters and local businesses by facilitating better transportation access.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specifically affected stakeholders might include local residents in the City of Palm Coast and surrounding areas in Flagler and St. Johns Counties. They stand to benefit from improved infrastructure, which might enhance local economic development prospects. However, there might be temporary disruptions and inconveniences as construction activities progress, including potential noise and environmental disturbances.

Local businesses could experience both positive and negative impacts. On the one hand, the construction might inconvenience daily operations or deter customer access temporarily. On the other hand, upon completion, the improved road infrastructure could lead to increased business as it enhances accessibility and attracts more traffic to these areas.

Overall, while the document outlines critical advancements in proceedings for this infrastructure project, it raises several issues regarding translatable details and public involvement, thus making it essential to address these areas to foster informed community participation and maintain transparency.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific cost details or budget information for the project, which makes it difficult to evaluate potential wasteful spending.

  • • The document does not mention any specific organizations or individuals that might benefit from the project, making transparency regarding potential favoritism unclear.

  • • The language is generally clear, but the use of numerous acronyms and statutory references without further explanation may be difficult for laypersons to understand.

  • • The document contains a detailed list of legislative and regulatory references that could be overwhelming and difficult to follow for those who are not familiar with legal and environmental compliance requirements.

  • • There is no mention of a public comment period or stakeholder engagement process, which might be a concern for ensuring adequate community involvement and input in the decision-making process.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,376
Sentences: 68
Entities: 215

Language

Nouns: 515
Verbs: 52
Adjectives: 33
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 169

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.93
Average Sentence Length:
20.24
Token Entropy:
5.33
Readability (ARI):
15.15

Reading Time

about 4 minutes