Overview
Title
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases is having a private online meeting in June to check out special grant requests, and they need to keep it secret because it involves private information, like secret recipes or people's personal details.
Summary AI
This notice announces a closed meeting of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases' Digestive Diseases and Nutrition C Study Section. The meeting is scheduled for June 11-13, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and its purpose is to review and evaluate grant applications. It will be held virtually and will discuss materials that contain confidential trade secrets or personal information that should remain private. Peter J. Kozel, Ph.D., is the contact person for this meeting.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document is an official notice about a closed meeting of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). It appears in the Federal Register and provides essential details about the meeting, which is scheduled for June 11-13, 2025. This meeting will discuss grant applications related to digestive diseases and nutrition. Due to the sensitive nature of the agenda, which involves confidential trade secrets and personal information, the meeting will be held privately. The meeting will occur virtually, and Peter J. Kozel, Ph.D., has been listed as the contact person for any inquiries.
General Summary
The notice serves as an announcement of a meeting organized by the NIDDK, specifically its Digestive Diseases and Nutrition C Study Section. The purpose of this meeting is to review and evaluate grant applications that pertain to initiatives in digestive diseases and nutrition. It is scheduled to take place over three days in June, and due to the confidential information involved, it will be closed to the public and conducted virtually.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several significant issues arise from the notice. Primarily, the meeting's closure is justified by references to specific legal codes (Title 5, U.S.C., sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6)), highlighting the need to protect confidential information. However, the notice does not elaborate on the specific types of information deemed confidential, which could lead to concerns about transparency and accountability. Moreover, the references to legal statutes might be confusing for individuals unfamiliar with legal jargon, potentially obscuring understanding for a general audience.
Additionally, the notice mentions billing codes and references specific Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program numbers. Yet, it fails to clarify how these references relate to the content or objectives of the meeting. This lack of context could cause confusion about the meeting's broader implications.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the document indicates that certain governmental processes involving federal funding allocations for research are conducted behind closed doors to protect sensitive information. While such closures are legally permissible, they may contribute to a perception of non-transparency in public sector operations. The lack of detailed reasoning for the meeting's confidentiality might impede public trust in the decision-making processes of government agencies.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For researchers and institutions involved in digestive diseases and nutrition, this notice is crucial as it pertains directly to grant applications that could fund their work. The closure of the meeting means that these stakeholders cannot participate in or observe the evaluation proceedings, possibly leading to questions about the fairness and thoroughness of the process.
Conversely, the protection of confidential information within these meetings is beneficial to stakeholders looking to protect their intellectual property and sensitive data. Ensuring the confidentiality of trade secrets and personal information is vital to maintaining the trust and participation of individuals and organizations in the federal grant application process. This confidentiality helps protect the interests of applicants against unwarranted exposure or potential exploitation of their proprietary research.
In summary, while the document reveals essential information about an upcoming closed meeting, its opacity regarding the necessity of confidentiality and connections between the meeting's agenda and federal assistance programs comes with concerns about transparency and public accountability.
Issues
• The document mentions that the meeting will be closed to the public based on sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6) of Title 5, U.S.C. This means it involves confidential information or personal privacy concerns, but it does not provide specific details on what these might be, which could lead to concerns about transparency.
• The notice provides details about the committee's name, date, time, agenda, and contact person, but does not explicitly explain why the meeting must be closed and how it serves the public interest, which could raise questions about accountability.
• The billing code and references to Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program numbers are provided, but no context is given for how these relate to the content of the meeting, which might cause confusion.
• The language used in mentioning statutes and codes (e.g., 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.) could be unclear to those not familiar with legal codes, potentially making it difficult for a layperson to understand the reason for the meeting's confidentiality.