FR 2025-04738

Overview

Title

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute is having a secret meeting on May 6, 2025, to talk about who should get money to help small businesses that are trying to make new health tools. They are keeping it private so that people’s personal details and ideas stay safe.

Summary AI

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has announced a closed meeting scheduled for May 6, 2025. The meeting will focus on reviewing and evaluating grant applications related to small businesses in rehabilitation and bioengineering. It will be conducted virtually to protect confidential information and personal privacy. Interested parties can contact Magnus A. Azuine, Ph.D., for more details.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 13177
Document #: 2025-04738
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 13177-13177

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces a closed meeting organized by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Scheduled for May 6, 2025, the meeting will focus on reviewing and evaluating grant applications related to small businesses in the fields of rehabilitation and bioengineering. The meeting will be conducted virtually. Importantly, it is noted that the meeting is closed to the public to protect confidential information and personal privacy.

General Overview

This notice serves as a formal announcement of an upcoming meeting where experts will deliberate on grant applications. The focus specifically on small businesses in rehabilitation and bioengineering indicates a targeted initiative to stimulate innovation and support within these scientific arenas. Conducting such meetings virtually has become more common, facilitating participation from diverse stakeholders while maintaining confidentiality.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document raises several issues and areas for concern:

  1. Lack of an Abstract: The notice does not contain an abstract to summarize the meeting's purpose and significance. Inclusion of an abstract could facilitate broader understanding for stakeholders who are not deeply familiar with governmental notices.

  2. Lack of Transparency: While the meeting's confidentiality is justified as protecting sensitive information, the document does not provide specific examples or details about the type of grant applications or discussions that require such privacy.

  3. Complexity and Accessibility: The formal and legalistic tone of the document might make it inaccessible to a general audience. References to specific sections of the U.S. Code without further context add to its complexity.

  4. Grant Evaluation Criteria: The notice does not reveal the criteria or process for evaluating the grant applications. Such details could enhance transparency and understanding of how decisions are reached.

  5. Access Information: Though the meeting is closed, it might still be beneficial to include details on how interested parties can engage with the process or results.

Public Impact

The document primarily impacts researchers and businesses within the rehabilitation and bioengineering sectors. By supporting these fields, the institute may indirectly contribute to advancements that benefit the broader public, including innovative therapies, devices, and technologies tailored for rehabilitation needs.

Stakeholder Impact

  • Researchers and Small Businesses: This notice represents an opportunity for researchers and small business owners in the specified fields to potentially secure funding and support for their innovations. The process could foster significant advancements in technologies and methods that aid individuals needing rehabilitation.

  • Public Participants: The lack of public access to the meeting's virtual component limits opportunities for public engagement. While confidentiality is cited as a necessity, enhancing transparency could build trust in the evaluation process.

Overall, while the meeting aims to advance critical research areas, the manner in which the notice communicates its details could be improved to better inform and engage a wider audience. Enhanced transparency, accessibility, and clarity would benefit both stakeholders and the general public, ensuring the process is both understood and trusted.

Issues

  • • The document lacks an abstract, which could provide a summary of the meeting's purpose and significance, making it easier for stakeholders to understand.

  • • The notice does not specify why the meeting is closed in terms of specific grant applications or discussions, beyond potential disclosure of confidential information, which might make the reasoning less transparent.

  • • The document is largely formal and complex, potentially making it difficult for individuals without a legal or governmental background to fully understand the implications of the meeting.

  • • There is no mention of the criteria or process for grant evaluation, which could help in understanding how decisions are made.

  • • Details about how to access the virtual meeting are not included, which could be helpful even though the meeting is closed to the public.

  • • Some laypeople might find references to U.S. Code without explanation (e.g., 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6)) difficult to interpret without additional context.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 343
Sentences: 12
Entities: 44

Language

Nouns: 145
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.40
Average Sentence Length:
28.58
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
21.51

Reading Time

about a minute or two