Overview
Title
Voluntary Self-Reported Exit (VSRE) Pilot
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection is starting a test program where some people leaving the U.S. can use a phone app to take a picture of their face to check out more easily. This helps them see if this new way works well for tracking who comes and goes.
Summary AI
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is launching a Voluntary Self-Reported Exit (VSRE) Pilot to collect facial images from certain non-U.S. citizens leaving the United States. This pilot, starting on March 19, 2025, will use a mobile app to gather and verify biometrics, aiming to improve the accuracy of entry-exit records by using facial recognition and geolocation technology. The pilot will help CBP evaluate the effectiveness and user-friendliness of this technology, potentially creating a more automated and secure system for tracking exits. Participation is voluntary, focusing on those subject to the I-94 form requirements.
Abstract
This notice announces that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will conduct a Voluntary Self-Reported Exit (VSRE) Pilot to collect facial images from certain aliens, specifically aliens subject to Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) requirements, exiting the United States from any location. CBP will conduct the VSRE Pilot to determine the effectiveness of this technology as part of CBP's initiatives to create a comprehensive biometrics entry-exit system, as well as to further automate the I-94 process for these aliens. This notice describes the purpose of the pilot, pilot procedures, how CBP will use the collected data, eligible participants, duration of the pilot, how CBP will analyze the results, and privacy considerations.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The "Voluntary Self-Reported Exit (VSRE) Pilot" is an initiative by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) aimed at testing new technology to track the departure of non-U.S. citizens from the United States. By utilizing a mobile application, participants will be able to submit facial images and other relevant information to confirm their exit. This pilot program, set to start on March 19, 2025, hopes to improve the accuracy of entry-exit records through advanced techniques like facial recognition and geolocation. The pilot will run for two years, and participation is entirely voluntary, specifically targeting those required to fill out an I-94 form upon entering the United States.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One issue is the absence of detail regarding the financial implications of this pilot. Without information on the estimated cost, it becomes challenging to evaluate if the expenditure aligns with government efficiency goals or if there might be potential waste. Furthermore, the document does not mention any vendors or contractors involved, which could obscure transparency and lead to speculation on the possibility of favoritism in the selection of technology providers.
The technical language used when explaining the geolocation and liveness detection features might pose an understanding barrier for individuals who are not familiar with such technologies. This could limit stakeholder engagement and public feedback on the pilot.
Additionally, the protocol to handle app malfunctions is somewhat underdeveloped, making it unclear what steps travelers should take if errors occur. This gap in information may lead to confusion or distrust among users.
There is also a lack of defined metrics for evaluating the success of the pilot. Without clear criteria, the effectiveness of the pilot may be difficult to ascertain, which could influence future decision-making processes about the program’s expansion or modification.
Impact on the Public
The broader public might see mixed results from this pilot. On one side, the initiative could streamline and secure border crossing procedures, potentially minimizing fraud and aiding in identifying security threats. On the other hand, those who are wary of digital surveillance and data privacy might view the collection of biometric information as intrusive or excessive.
For non-U.S. citizens subject to the I-94 requirement, this pilot potentially offers a more convenient way to report their departure, specifically addressing the cumbersome nature of current reporting methods at land borders. However, the voluntary nature and technical barriers could limit participation and, thus, the attainment of comprehensive exit data.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Non-U.S. Citizens: Individuals using the I-94 process could benefit from a streamlined, convenient way to report their exit, facilitating compliance and reducing confusion about their immigration status. However, they might be concerned about privacy and the security of their personal data.
CBP and DHS: The pilot may serve as a valuable tool for these agencies to improve operational efficiency and enhance national security. Successfully capturing biometric and geolocation data more accurately is aligned with their goal of a comprehensive entry-exit system.
Technology Providers: Companies developing and providing this technology stand to benefit from governmental contracts and may influence future standard practices in border management.
Privacy Advocates: These groups may view this initiative with skepticism, concerned about the implications for personal privacy and data security. Ensuring proper use and protection of collected data will likely be a point of contention.
In conclusion, the VSRE Pilot represents a significant step towards modernizing U.S. border management systems. However, clear communication about costs, vendor selection, technical procedures, and privacy safeguards is essential to achieving stakeholder buy-in and public confidence.
Issues
• The document does not specify the estimated cost of the pilot program, which makes it difficult to assess if there is any potential wasteful spending.
• There is no clear mention of any specific vendor or contractor that CBP would engage for the technology used in the pilot, which could hide potential favoritism.
• The language used to describe the geolocation and liveness detection technologies is somewhat technical, which may be challenging for non-expert stakeholders to fully understand.
• The section on the limitations and consequences for travelers if the app malfunctions could be elaborated to provide clearer guidance on the steps to take post-error.
• There is a lack of specific success metrics for evaluating the pilot's effectiveness, which could lead to ambiguity in determining the pilot's success or failure.
• The privacy considerations section is comprehensive but could be perceived as complex due to multiple referenced documents and systems, which may need simplification or summarization for better public understanding.