FR 2025-04531

Overview

Title

Release of Waybill Data

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Surface Transportation Board got a message from the University of Illinois asking to look at some secret train data. If anyone thinks they shouldn't get to see the data, they need to say something in two weeks.

Summary AI

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign seeking permission to use data from the Board's 1986-2023 unmasked Carload Waybill Samples. This data is confidential and involves railroad and shipper information. Any objections to this request must be filed within 14 calendar days from the notice's publication date. For more information or inquiries, individuals can contact the Board via email at waybill@stb.gov.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12928
Document #: 2025-04531
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12928-12928

AnalysisAI

The recent notice from the Surface Transportation Board, documented as 90 FR 12928 and published on March 19, 2025, details a request from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign to access the confidential Carload Waybill Samples spanning from 1986 to 2023. This request is of interest due to the sensitive nature of the information contained within these samples, which includes data concerning railroads and shippers.

General Summary

The document is essentially a notice of a request for access to specific transportation data. The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign has applied to use these unmasked waybill samples for research purposes. Those who might have concerns about the release of such data are invited to submit objections to the Surface Transportation Board within 14 days following the publication of the notice. Further inquiries can be sent to the provided email address, waybill@stb.gov.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues with the document is the absence of an abstract or summary that could quickly inform readers of its contents. Quick access to such details could be beneficial for stakeholders and the general public. Additionally, the notice does not elaborate on the potential ramifications of granting the request to the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Understanding the broader consequences of such a request could help the public better evaluate its significance.

Another point of concern is the lack of clarity regarding the consequences or further procedures if objections are raised. This lack of transparency might cause uncertainty among those directly affected by this data's release. Furthermore, while the email provided allows for inquiries, there is no mention of what the inquiry process involves or the typical timeline for responses, which may deter interested parties from reaching out for more information.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, especially those with an interest in transportation and logistics, this document underscores the balance between research and confidentiality. The waybill data potentially serves as a valuable resource for academic and practical insights into transportation trends and logistics management.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as railroad companies and shippers, the release of this data could have significant implications. Access to raw data might yield competitive insights or expose commercial vulnerabilities, thus making them more cautious about the data being shared. Conversely, for academic institutions and researchers, such data could offer unprecedented opportunities for enhancing understanding within the field of transportation logistics.

In conclusion, while the document outlines a procedural notice, improvements in transparency and communication could enhance its effectiveness and inform the public and stakeholders more completely and confidently.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide an abstract which could give a brief overview of the notice, making it less accessible to someone quickly reviewing the document.

  • • There is no explanation of the potential implications or significance of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign using this data, which could help the public understand the importance of this request.

  • • The document does not mention any potential consequences or actions taken if objections to the data request are received, leaving the process somewhat unclear.

  • • Although the notice provides an email for inquiries, it could have benefited from a brief explanation of the typical inquiry process or expected response time to assist interested parties better.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 168
Sentences: 8
Entities: 17

Language

Nouns: 57
Verbs: 9
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 14

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.35
Average Sentence Length:
21.00
Token Entropy:
4.47
Readability (ARI):
12.76

Reading Time

less than a minute