FR 2025-04486

Overview

Title

PE Hydro Generation, LLC; Notice of Reasonable Period of Time for Water Quality Certification Application

Agencies

ELI5 AI

PE Hydro Generation, LLC asked for permission to make sure their project won't hurt the water in Virginia, and the people in charge have until December 2025 to decide. If they don't make a decision by then, it's like saying "Yes" automatically.

Summary AI

PE Hydro Generation, LLC submitted a request for a water quality certification for a project to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, on December 17, 2024. The request is in accordance with section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act and regulations by the Commission. Virginia DEQ has until December 17, 2025, to act on this request. If they do not act by this deadline, the authority to certify is considered waived under relevant laws.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12731
Document #: 2025-04486
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12731-12731

AnalysisAI

The document at hand is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) concerning a water quality certification request submitted by PE Hydro Generation, LLC. This request, made to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (Virginia DEQ), aims to secure certification under section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act. The notice specifies that Virginia DEQ received this request on December 17, 2024, and has a deadline of one year, until December 17, 2025, to take action. If Virginia DEQ does not act by this date, the certification authority is considered waived.

General Summary

This notice officially informs the Virginia DEQ of the timeline for their response to the water quality certification request. The Clean Water Act's section 401(a)(1) ensures that any entity looking to proceed with certain projects impacting water resources must obtain a state certification verifying compliance with water quality standards. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is overseeing this process to ensure adherence to regulatory timelines.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are a few notable issues within this document:

  1. Lack of Project Specifics: The text does not specify the actual project for which the certification is being requested. This omission can leave stakeholders and the public unsure about the potential environmental impacts or benefits.

  2. Unclear Footnote Reference: The document references multiple regulatory sections through a footnote without specifying which one is applicable. This lack of clarity can pose challenges for individuals unfamiliar with the regulatory framework.

  3. Abrupt Ending: The document ends rather abruptly without a clear conclusion or next steps, which could potentially confuse those seeking comprehensive understanding.

  4. Missing Contextual Information: The document's metadata lacks an abstract and action item, which could have provided additional context or understanding of the document's intent or importance.

Impact on the Public

This document is important for the public, as it relates to environmental regulation and water quality standards that can affect local ecosystems and water resources. By following the regulatory process, the public can ensure that projects comply with environmental standards aimed at protecting water quality.

Stakeholder Impacts

  • Positive Impact on Environmental Advocacy Groups: These groups tend to support stricter scrutiny of projects that could impact water quality. They may view this notice as a positive step in ensuring that potential projects undergo appropriate environmental review.

  • Utility Companies and Project Developers: These stakeholders might face some uncertainty due to the timeline involved and the requirement to secure necessary certifications. However, the defined timeframe provides a clear period to achieve compliance, preventing indefinite delays.

  • Virginia DEQ and Regulatory Bodies: The notice serves as a formal reminder and an accountability mechanism, ensuring they act within a specified period. It emphasizes the importance of their role in maintaining environmental standards.

Overall, this notice is an integral part of the regulatory process that upholds environmental protections while allowing public and stakeholder involvement in potential developmental projects. It seeks to balance development needs with environmental preservation, although its lack of specifics and clarity in some aspects invites questions that stakeholders might need to address.

Issues

  • • There is no abstract provided in the metadata, which might be useful for summarization purposes.

  • • The document ends abruptly without a clear conclusion, which might confuse some readers.

  • • Footnote reference '[1]' in the document text is unclear and does not specify which section or clause applies, as it lists multiple regulatory sections. This reference can be confusing for those unfamiliar with the specific regulatory context.

  • • The specific 'action' section in the metadata is null, which could provide additional context for understanding the document's purpose or intent.

  • • The document does not specify the project for which the water quality certification is being requested, making it unclear to what the notice pertains.

  • • The metadata lists 'Notice' as the type but does not provide a subtype, which might help in classifying or understanding the document's intent more clearly.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 245
Sentences: 8
Entities: 36

Language

Nouns: 79
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 30

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.75
Average Sentence Length:
30.62
Token Entropy:
4.55
Readability (ARI):
19.34

Reading Time

less than a minute