FR 2025-04405

Overview

Title

Data Collection Available for Public Comments

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Small Business Administration wants to hear from people about how they collect information to process loans for a program that is no longer giving out new loans, but still needs to finish some paperwork. They ask for comments but may not make it easy for everyone to share their thoughts.

Summary AI

The Small Business Administration (SBA) is seeking public comments on its information collection related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), following the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule is intended to gather feedback before submitting the information to the Office of Management and Budget for review. Although the authority to issue new PPP loans has expired, the SBA still needs this information to process loan forgiveness applications, conduct reviews, and handle any ongoing litigation. The existing information collection will remain necessary due to the extended retention requirements for lender records.

Abstract

The Small Business Administration (SBA) is publishing this notice in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, as amended, to solicit public comments on the information collection described below. The PRA requires publication of this notice before submitting the information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12630
Document #: 2025-04405
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12630-12631

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document under review is a notice from the Small Business Administration (SBA) seeking public comments concerning the information collection associated with the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). This initiative follows the regulations set forth by the Paperwork Reduction Act, requiring such notices prior to submittal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. The purpose is to collect data that remains necessary for processing PPP loan forgiveness applications, conducting loan reviews, and managing ongoing litigation, despite the program's official end.

General Summary

The document outlines a call for public comments by the SBA on information collection practices tied to the PPP. The PPP was a financial lifeline during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing loans to small businesses and other eligible entities severely impacted by the economic shutdowns. Although the ability to grant new loans has ceased, the SBA still requires this data for loan forgiveness procedures, potential reviews, and litigation management, as well as because of the extended document retention requirements for lenders.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One significant issue with the notice is its use of complex legal and bureaucratic language, possibly hindering the broader public's ability to understand and, thus, offer meaningful feedback. Additionally, some forms cited in the document reportedly have zero estimated respondents, which raises questions about their purpose and relevance. Despite reporting zero respondents, these forms still reflect a calculated burden in terms of hours, suggesting possible inefficiencies in how this data is managed or assessed.

Moreover, the document's solicitation for comments is limited to email submissions. This exclusivity might restrict accessibility for individuals without regular internet access, thereby narrowing the pool of feedback. There is also a lack of transparency regarding whether and how previous public comments have influenced the process, which might deter potential contributors who perceive their input as undervalued.

Impact on the Public

The collection of public comments is crucial as it potentially influences SBA's data collection and retention strategies, affecting small businesses and lenders involved in the PPP's history. SBA's efforts to prolong the information collection mandate potentially maintain operational efficiency in managing outstanding loans and forgiveness. However, this persistence also raises questions about ongoing administrative demands on resources, posing concerns about the cost-effectiveness and allocation of public funds.

Impact on Stakeholders

For small business owners and financial institutions previously engaged in the PPP, this notice may have mixed implications. On one hand, the continuous collection and retention of data offer prolonged support and possibility for thorough loan forgiveness processes. On the other hand, stakeholders might view this as bureaucratic overextension that consumes resources and prolongs paperwork unnecessarily, especially when the active phases of the PPP have concluded.

Even with the positive aspects of data collection, the document's exclusivity in comment submission could prevent some stakeholders from participating, potentially limiting the diversity and range of feedback received. Enhanced transparency about how past public insights have shaped the present process might encourage greater involvement and trust from both public commenters and stakeholders directly impacted by these federal programs.

In conclusion, while this notice serves a regulatory need, it presents multiple areas for potential refinement to ensure more inclusive public participation and efficient resource use. Addressing these issues could improve both understanding and effective engagement from all parties involved.

Issues

  • • The document contains complex legal and bureaucratic language which can be difficult for the general public to understand, potentially limiting meaningful public input.

  • • The Notice does not specify if or how previously raised public comments have influenced past decisions or changes in the data collection process.

  • • The document mentions that the estimated number of respondents for several forms is zero, raising questions about the necessity and relevance of those forms.

  • • It is unclear why certain forms have an estimated hour burden despite having zero estimated respondents or why data collection continues despite the expiration of the PPP authority.

  • • The solicitation for public comments does not provide alternative methods for submitting feedback aside from email, potentially limiting accessibility for those without regular internet access.

  • • There is no explanation about the potential impact of extending the information collection on SBA resources or on the efficiency of public fund use.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,304
Sentences: 62
Entities: 131

Language

Nouns: 483
Verbs: 97
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 97

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.34
Average Sentence Length:
21.03
Token Entropy:
5.14
Readability (ARI):
17.40

Reading Time

about 4 minutes