FR 2025-04358

Overview

Title

Notice of Inventory Completion: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Peabody Museum at Harvard has found out which Native American groups some old bones belong to, and now they're working to give them back to the right people, starting April 17, 2025.

Summary AI

The Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University has completed an inventory of human remains collected in the 1930s from two Indian Schools in South Dakota and Oregon. They have determined these remains are of Native American ancestry and are culturally affiliated with the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. The repatriation process for these remains will begin on or after April 17, 2025, giving these tribes or any other culturally affiliated groups the opportunity to request the return of their ancestors' remains. This process is carried out under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University (PMAE) has completed an inventory of human remains and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice. The human remains were collected at the Flandreau Indian School, Moody County, SD and the Chemawa (Salem) Indian School, Marion County, OR.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12564
Document #: 2025-04358
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12564-12565

AnalysisAI

The document under review is an official notice from the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University, detailing the inventory and repatriation of human remains in compliance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). This notice signifies a crucial step towards respecting Native American cultural heritage by recognizing the ancestral connections of human remains in museums and other institutions.

General Summary

The notice informs the public that the Peabody Museum has completed an inventory of human remains collected from two Indian schools in the 1930s and has determined that these remains are culturally connected to Native American tribes. Specifically, the remains are affiliated with the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. The repatriation, or return, of these remains to the rightful communities is set to begin on or after April 17, 2025. The notice provides contact information for further inquiries and emphasizes the museum's commitment to handling the process in accordance with NAGPRA.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are a few notable issues present in the document:

  1. Lack of Specificity on Eligible Parties: The document does not clearly specify all the eligible Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations aside from the identified Confederated Tribes. This could cause some confusion about who is eligible to claim the remains for repatriation.

  2. Complex Legal References: The document includes references to legal texts (25 U.S.C. 3003, 43 CFR 10.10) without offering a layperson's explanation. For those unfamiliar with legal terminology, this could be challenging to comprehend and may require additional research.

  3. Ambiguity in Repatriation Procedures: The document does not outline the specific procedures or criteria that the Peabody Museum will use to decide between competing repatriation requests. This lack of clarity could lead to disputes or delays in the repatriation process.

Impact on the Public

The document serves as a concrete example of institutions taking accountability for the historical injustices committed against Native American communities. It highlights the ongoing efforts to return cultural artifacts and remains to their rightful stewards. For the general public, this can enhance understanding and awareness of the importance of cultural heritage preservation and respect. However, the document's complexity might limit its accessibility, potentially hindering broader public engagement or understanding.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impact:

  • Native American Communities: The notice positively affects the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation by recognizing their rights to reclaim ancestral remains. It provides a pathway for restoring a critical part of their heritage and history.

  • Cultural Preservation Advocates: The document is a step forward in the broader movement toward greater respect for and protection of Native American cultural sites and artifacts.

Negative Impact:

  • Ambiguity-Related Concerns: The lack of specificity regarding eligible tribes and repatriation procedures could lead to disputes or feelings of exclusion among other tribes with potential claims, causing discord or delays in the restorative process.

Overall, while the document presents an essential development in the repatriation landscape, addressing the identified issues could improve its clarity and effectiveness in fulfilling its intended purpose.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the specific Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations involved beyond the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, which may lead to ambiguity regarding eligible parties for repatriation.

  • • The document includes complex legal references (25 U.S.C. 3003, 43 CFR 10.10) that might be difficult for general audiences to understand without additional explanation or context.

  • • There is no mention of any specific procedures or criteria the PMAE will use to determine the most appropriate requestor in the event of competing requests for repatriation, which could lead to ambiguity and disputes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 844
Sentences: 35
Entities: 90

Language

Nouns: 275
Verbs: 61
Adjectives: 55
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 46

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.84
Average Sentence Length:
24.11
Token Entropy:
4.94
Readability (ARI):
17.11

Reading Time

about 2 minutes