FR 2025-04301

Overview

Title

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases is having a special meeting on April 4, 2025, to talk about research project grants, but it's a private meeting so nobody else can join. They want to keep it private to protect secrets and people's personal information.

Summary AI

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the Health and Human Services Department, announced a closed meeting scheduled for April 4, 2025. The meeting will focus on reviewing and evaluating grant applications related to research projects that do not involve clinical trials. It is closed to the public to protect confidential information and personal privacy. The meeting will be conducted via video, and Maryam Rohani, Ph.D., is the contact person for more information.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12540
Document #: 2025-04301
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12540-12540

AnalysisAI

The document under review is a notice from the Federal Register, titled "National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting." The notice is important as it pertains to the administration and evaluation of grant applications, specifically those related to research projects that do not include clinical trials. This notice is issued by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is a part of the Health and Human Services Department.

General Summary

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has announced a closed meeting scheduled for April 4, 2025. The primary purpose of this meeting is to review and evaluate various grant applications. The focus is on projects involving allergy, immunology, and microbiology research that steer clear of clinical trials. Due to the nature of the information involved, including potential trade secrets and personal information, the meeting will not be open to the public. Instead, it will be conducted as a video-assisted meeting.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the notable issues is the confidentiality and privacy concerns that necessitate the closure of this meeting to the public. The rationale is clear: discussions may involve sensitive trade secrets, patentable material, or personal information whose disclosure isn't warranted. While these reasons are legitimate, the exclusion of the public might raise concerns about transparency, particularly in how grants are awarded and which projects are prioritized.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this closed meeting reflects how government agencies make decisions on funding important research. The emphasis on confidentiality helps maintain the integrity of competitive research funding processes, ensuring innovators can protect their ideas until they are ready to be publicly disclosed. However, because the public is excluded, there is a reduced opportunity for communal oversight in the decision-making process.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The notice will primarily affect researchers and organizations applying for grants. These stakeholders are directly impacted as the outcome of this meeting can significantly influence the direction of their research projects. Positively, the process can lead to substantial funding for promising research areas, advancing the scientific community's understanding of critical health issues.

Conversely, those who do not receive funding might face setbacks in their research efforts. The structured and confidential nature of the meeting ensures an objective review process, but it also limits applicants' insight into how decisions were made, which can be a source of frustration.

Overall, while the document sets clear logistical details and justifies the closed nature of the meeting, it underscores typical tensions between the need for confidentiality and public knowledge in federal grant processes. Stakeholders should remain engaged with the process, using available channels to understand criteria and decisions as much as possible. This understanding is crucial for researchers to tailor their future applications effectively and for the public to trust in fair practices within federally-funded research initiatives.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 330
Sentences: 13
Entities: 42

Language

Nouns: 131
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.45
Average Sentence Length:
25.38
Token Entropy:
4.65
Readability (ARI):
20.08

Reading Time

about a minute or two