Overview
Title
Fisheries of the South Atlantic; Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government is planning a big meeting to learn more about red snapper fish in the South Atlantic Ocean, starting on April 28, 2025, in Charleston, SC. People can join the meeting to share ideas and learn more, and there will be help for anyone who might have special needs to make sure they can participate.
Summary AI
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is announcing a Data Workshop as part of the SEDAR 90 assessment process for South Atlantic Red Snapper. This workshop will take place from April 28 to May 2, 2025, at the Town & Country Inn and Suites in Charleston, SC. The assessment aims to gather and assess data about the red snapper's stock status, with input from various industry and scientific stakeholders. Interested individuals are encouraged to attend, and the meetings will be accessible to people with disabilities.
Abstract
The SEDAR 90 assessment process of South Atlantic Red Snapper will consist of a Data Workshop, and a series of assessment webinars, and a Review Workshop. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question is a notice from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). It announces a Data Workshop that is part of the SEDAR 90 assessment process for evaluating the status of the South Atlantic Red Snapper fish stock. This workshop is scheduled to occur from April 28 to May 2, 2025, in Charleston, South Carolina. The primary goal of the assessment is to compile and evaluate data to determine the status of the red snapper population in the region.
Summary of the Document
The notice outlines the SEDAR 90 process, which involves a series of workshops and webinars aimed at assessing fish stocks. These workshops bring together various stakeholders, including data collectors, stock assessment scientists, fishermen, and environmentalists, to provide a comprehensive, science-based understanding of the red snapper's stock status. The process includes gathering datasets that cover life history characteristics, catch statistics, and stock abundance measures.
Significant Issues or Concerns
Several issues within the document warrant attention:
Emergency Actions Clarity: An emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act is alluded to without sufficient detail. Further clarification on what qualifies as an emergency action would be beneficial to all stakeholders.
Meeting Adjustment Procedures: The document allows for adjustments in meeting times to ensure thorough discussions. However, it does not specify how these changes will be communicated, which could lead to confusion among participants.
Handling Non-Agenda Issues: While the document notes that non-agenda issues may arise during discussions, there is no clear guideline on how these discussions will be handled or documented, potentially leading to ambiguity.
Details on Special Accommodations: The document mentions requests for sign language interpretation, requiring a 10-day notice, but lacks comprehensive details on other available accommodations, which might constrain some participants' accessibility.
Impact on the Public
The document's public impact is primarily informational, serving to notify stakeholders and interested parties about the upcoming Data Workshop. By doing so, it allows individuals and organizations interested in the management and conservation of the South Atlantic Red Snapper to engage in the process.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders, such as environmental organizations, state and federal agency representatives, and the fishing industry, this notice represents an important opportunity to contribute to and influence the assessment of the red snapper stock. By participating in the workshop, they can ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the data and the resulting management recommendations.
However, without clear guidance on emergency actions and meeting adjustments, stakeholders might find difficulty in anticipating and adapting to any sudden changes in the schedule or workshop focus. This could affect their ability to participate effectively and fully advocate for their interests.
In summary, while the document efficiently communicates the logistics of an important upcoming workshop for red snapper assessment, it does require greater clarity on emergency procedures, communication protocols for time adjustments, and comprehensive accessibility details to enhance stakeholder engagement and input.
Issues
• The document mentions emergency actions under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act but lacks clarity on what constitutes an emergency action.
• The document specifies adjustments in meeting times but does not provide specific procedures or guidelines on how these adjustments will be communicated to participants.
• The document states that non-emergency issues not contained in the agenda may come up for discussion but provides no guideline on how such discussions will be managed or documented.
• The document's section on special accommodations mentions that requests for sign language interpretation should be made 10 business days prior but lacks detail on other types of accommodations that might be available.