FR 2025-04173

Overview

Title

Notice of Intended Disposition: U.S. Department of Defense, Navy, Naval Base Coronado San Clemente Island, San Diego, CA

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. Navy wants to give back some special objects, like old tools and sacred items, to Native American groups because they belong to them. Some grown-ups have to say who should get these objects, and anyone who wants to claim them has until March 17, 2026, to do so.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of Defense is planning to transfer certain cultural items from San Clemente Island to appropriate Native American groups. These items, which include funerary objects and sacred artifacts, were collected between 1991 and 2015 by various organizations working for the Navy. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) guides this process and specifies priority for certain tribes, including the La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians and others. Claims for these items can be submitted until March 17, 2026, after which items with no claims will be deemed unclaimed.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), U.S. Department of Defense, Navy, Naval Base Coronado San Clemente Island (Naval Base Coronado), intends to carry out the disposition of unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony removed from Federal or Tribal lands to the lineal descendants, Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization with priority for disposition in this notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12336
Document #: 2025-04173
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12336-12337

AnalysisAI

The document is a formal notice pertaining to the U.S. Department of Defense’s intentions to manage the disposition of certain cultural items from San Clemente Island in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). It indicates that the Navy, through Naval Base Coronado, plans to transfer these items, which include unassociated funerary objects and sacred artifacts, to relevant Native American groups. These cultural items were collected between 1991 and 2015 by various organizations contracted by the Navy. The notice outlines the process and deadlines for claims, specifying that if no claims are received by March 17, 2026, the items will be deemed unclaimed.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several areas of ambiguity within the document. It's noted that the exact number of unassociated funerary objects and sacred objects is unclear, described only as "at least one," which could create confusion regarding the total quantity of items available for disposition. Additionally, terms like "unassociated funerary objects" and "cultural patrimony" are technical and might not be easily understood by those outside NAGPRA or archaeological circles without further explanation.

The document states that only certain tribes and groups, including the La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians, are prioritized for receiving these items. However, it does not clearly define how this priority is determined. Additionally, if there are multiple interested parties, the guidance on resolving such disputes is minimal, merely stating that Naval Base Coronado must determine the most appropriate claimant. This lack of detail could be challenging for potential claimants attempting to understand their standing or strategize their claims.

Public Impact

For the general public, this notice will primarily be of interest to those involved with Native American rights and cultural repatriation. It underscores the ongoing efforts to return culturally significant items to their rightful owners. However, for casual readers, the complexity and specificity of terminology may limit their engagement or understanding of the document’s implications.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Indigenous groups listed in the document, this notice represents a potentially significant opportunity for cultural restoration and the reclamation of sacred objects that hold historical and spiritual importance. Successfully claiming these items could greatly benefit these communities by restoring part of their cultural heritage. However, the ambiguity surrounding the prioritization process could cause frustration or competition among tribes if not adequately managed and communicated.

On the other hand, the bureaucratic tone and complex vocabulary employed may create obstacles for individuals or groups lacking legal or archaeological expertise, potentially hindering some stakeholders from engaging fully with the notice or submitting claims. The National Park Service's role is mentioned, yet their responsibilities are not well clarified, which may also add to the confusion for stakeholders attempting to navigate the claims process.

In conclusion, while the document reflects a meaningful step towards cultural repatriation efforts, its effectiveness could be improved with clearer definitions and explanations of processes, prioritization criteria, and dispute resolution methods. Such improvements would enable a broader and more inclusive public understanding and stakeholder engagement.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the exact number of unassociated funerary objects and sacred objects/objects of cultural patrimony, using 'at least one', which could lead to ambiguity regarding the total count of items.

  • • The term 'unassociated funerary objects' might be unclear to those unfamiliar with NAGPRA terminology without further explanation.

  • • The document states 'lineal descendants, Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization with priority for disposition' without explicitly explaining how priority is determined, which may be relevant for claimants.

  • • Several entities are listed as having priority for disposition without clarification on whether they share equal priority or how conflicts will be resolved beyond identifying a 'most appropriate claimant'.

  • • The detailed list of items collected from San Clemente Island may be overly complex for some readers due to the use of specialized archaeological terms like 'debitage' and 'lithic tools'.

  • • No clear explanation is provided for what actions are required if there are competing claims, other than that the Naval Base Coronado must determine the most appropriate claimant.

  • • The document refers to the National Park Service's role but states they are not responsible for identification, which could cause confusion about their specific responsibilities.

  • • The document has a bureaucratic tone that may not be easily understandable to individuals outside of governmental or academic settings.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,076
Sentences: 30
Entities: 96

Language

Nouns: 384
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 96
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 37

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.99
Average Sentence Length:
35.87
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
23.67

Reading Time

about 4 minutes