FR 2025-04141

Overview

Title

Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Florida Gas wants to make their gas machine in Florida bigger so it can pump more gas for the power company and keep up with how much is needed. People can say what they think about this by sending in their thoughts by May 9, 2025.

Summary AI

Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC is seeking approval for a project to upgrade a natural gas compressor turbine at their Compressor Station 21 in Palm Beach County, Florida, raising its capacity from 6,500 horsepower to 7,700 horsepower. This project aims to accommodate increased demand from Florida Power and Light without expanding the overall capacity of their system. The cost is estimated at $9 million, and people can participate in the review process by filing protests, motions to intervene, or comments by May 9, 2025. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission encourages electronic submissions and provides resources for public participation.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 12314
Document #: 2025-04141
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 12314-12315

AnalysisAI

Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC has submitted a proposal seeking authorization to enhance its infrastructure at Compressor Station 21 situated in Palm Beach County, Florida. This project involves upgrading an existing natural gas-fired compressor turbine, increasing its capacity from 6,500 horsepower to 7,700 horsepower. The primary goal of this enhancement is to satisfy the rising demand from Florida Power and Light (FPL) for natural gas transportation services, without expanding the overall certificated capacity of the company's system. The estimated cost for this project is pegged at $9 million.

Issues and Concerns

One significant concern is the absence of a detailed breakdown of the $9 million budget allocation for this project. Such information is critical in ensuring transparency and accountability, reducing the risk of mismanagement or wasteful expenditure. Without this clarity, stakeholders may question how resources are being allocated and whether funds are being used efficiently.

Another concern arises from the project’s potential impact on other stakeholders. Although the project promises not to increase the overall certificated capacity of the system, it reallocates capacity to accommodate FPL’s needs. This reallocation raises questions about how it might affect the gas transportation services available to other customers, and whether their service quality or pricing might be impacted.

The document outlines ways for public engagement, such as filing protests, motions to intervene, or comments by May 9, 2025. However, the language used in these sections might present a barrier to participation due to its technical nature. Simplifying the language could enhance public understanding and encourage broader participation.

The lack of transparency regarding how public input from these activities will influence decision-making could potentially discourage public engagement. Clear communication on how comments and interventions are considered during the decision-making process would likely bolster public confidence and participation.

Additionally, the document references various technical regulations without offering a straightforward explanation of their implications. This might make it challenging for laypersons to grasp the regulatory context, thus impeding effective public participation.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this document and the project it describes highlight critical infrastructure developments that could influence natural gas transport services in Florida. By potentially increasing efficiency and capacity usage for FPL, this project may ensure a more reliable service for a key energy provider in the state. However, the effect on other stakeholders might vary depending on how the reallocation of resources is managed.

Specific stakeholders, such as other gas shippers or customers using Florida Gas’s services, need to consider how this project might alter their service conditions. Additionally, community members and environmental groups might have concerns regarding potential environmental impacts or local disruptions due to the construction and modification of facilities.

Overall, the document underscores important infrastructural developments, yet it needs to provide more clarity on budget specifics, impacts on other services, and the integration of public feedback into its decision-making processes. Addressing these areas could enhance stakeholder confidence and public engagement.

Financial Assessment

The document under analysis provides a notice from the Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC regarding a request for authorization to upgrade certain facilities as part of the CS 21 Enhancement Project. A central financial element is the estimated project cost of $9,000,000. This amount is a significant investment aimed at uprating the compressor turbine and installing additional auxiliary facilities necessary for achieving enhanced operational capacity without enlarging the overall certificated capacity of the natural gas system.

Summary of Financial Allocations

The primary financial allocation in the document is the project's estimated cost, which is set at $9,000,000. This budget covers the planned modifications, including upgrading an existing natural gas compressor turbine from 6,500 horsepower to 7,700 horsepower, as well as installing and modifying auxiliary facilities such as cooling towers. These modifications are necessary to meet the service demand for Florida Power and Light (FPL).

Relation to Identified Issues

Lack of Detailed Financial Breakdown: One issue identified in the document is the absence of a detailed breakdown of the $9,000,000 project estimate. The document does not specify how these funds will be precisely allocated across the various components of the project, such as labor, materials, or contingency funds. This lack of transparency can pose a risk of inefficient or wasteful spending, as stakeholders have little visibility into the financial management and planning of the project.

Impact on Stakeholders: Another concern is the allocation's impact on service to other stakeholders besides FPL. Although the project intends to enhance service to FPL, it remains unclear whether and how this financial outlay ensures the system efficiently reallocates capacity without negatively impacting other users. The financial allocation is designed to meet a specific service demand, yet the broader implications for system users alongside FPL are not explicitly addressed.

In summary, the $9,000,000 allocation for the Florida Gas Transmission Company's CS 21 Enhancement Project is intended to support infrastructure improvements to meet specific service requirements. However, the document does not provide sufficient financial details that might reassure stakeholders regarding fiscal responsibility and the implications for all system users. These gaps highlight the need for greater transparency and detailed financial planning in public notices of this nature.

Issues

  • • The document states that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC is planning a project with an estimated cost of $9,000,000, but there is no detailed breakdown of how this budget will be allocated, which could pose a risk of wasteful spending.

  • • The project is described as designed to meet the demand for natural gas transportation service for Florida Power and Light (FPL) without increasing the overall certificated capacity of the system, but it is unclear how the reallocation to FPL might impact service to other stakeholders.

  • • The language used in sections explaining how to file protests, interventions, and comments could be simplified to enhance public understanding and encourage participation.

  • • While the document outlines ways for individuals to participate (protests, interventions, comments), there is no direct mention of how input from these activities will be considered in decision-making, which might discourage public engagement.

  • • The document refers to several technical regulations (e.g., 18 CFR 157.205) without providing an accessible summary of their implications, making it difficult for non-experts to understand the regulatory context.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 2,009
Sentences: 73
Entities: 186

Language

Nouns: 614
Verbs: 194
Adjectives: 64
Adverbs: 38
Numbers: 110

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.05
Average Sentence Length:
27.52
Token Entropy:
5.49
Readability (ARI):
19.77

Reading Time

about 7 minutes