Overview
Title
Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band; Corrections
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FCC realized they made a mistake by including a rule that wasn't supposed to be there, like accidentally putting a toy in the wrong box. They've fixed it, so now everything is back where it should be.
Summary AI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has made amendments to correct errors in their rules, which were revised back on December 13, 2024. These errors resulted in incorrect information being published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The corrections are effective as of March 21, 2025, and involve the removal of a specific rule section from 47 CFR part 90 related to private land mobile radio services that was mistakenly included. For further questions, Jamie Coleman from the Office of Engineering and Technology can be contacted.
Abstract
On December 13, 2024, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) revised Commission rules. That document inadvertently added a rule section to its regulatory text that does not exist, resulting in an erroneous entry in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This document corrects these errors in the regulatory text and the final regulations as published in the CFR.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued a document aimed at correcting a mistake in its published rules. This document is part of the ongoing effort to maintain accuracy in the legal and regulatory frameworks that govern communications. It specifically addresses an erroneous rule section that was included in an earlier revision and has had to be subsequently removed from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
General Summary
In December 2024, the FCC revised a set of rules that cover various aspects of communications regulations. During this revision, a non-existent rule section, specifically § 90.394, was mistakenly added to the part of the regulations dealing with private land mobile radio services—these are used, for example, by businesses and emergency services for short-range communication. The document discussed here, effective as of March 21, 2025, serves to rectify this error by removing the erroneous entry from the regulations.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One of the key issues with the document is that it does not provide an in-depth explanation of the circumstances that led to the initial mistake. Without details on how the error occurred, stakeholders and the general public might find it difficult to understand the underlying problem. Furthermore, the document lacks a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of the error—why the presence of the non-existent rule might have been significant and how it could have affected compliance or operations in practice.
Public Impact
For the public, especially businesses and organizations relying on specific frequencies for communication, regulatory precision is critical. Errors and subsequent corrections in documents like these can cause temporary uncertainty or confusion until resolved. However, because this correction is highly specific, the broader public may experience minimal direct impact. It reassures stakeholders that the FCC is diligent in maintaining up-to-date and accurate rules, fostering trust in these systems over time.
Impact on Stakeholders
For stakeholders within the communications industry, particularly those involved in the use of private land mobile radio services, such corrections are crucial. The erroneous inclusion and subsequent removal of a rule could have imposed unexpected regulatory requirements or confusion. By addressing this mistake, the FCC helps to ensure compliance guidance is clear. The correction might positively impact stakeholders by preventing potential issues that might have arisen from the error, such as misinterpretation of requirements or unintended financial implications (e.g., penalties for non-compliance).
Overall, the document underscores the importance of regulatory precision and the commitment of the FCC to promptly correct any errors, thereby supporting a stable regulatory environment.
Issues
• The document describes the removal of a section (§ 90.394) that was inadvertently added, but does not provide detailed information on the potential impacts of this removal.
• The document does not specify the implications or reasons why the erroneous entry was impactful or how it affected stakeholders.
• While the document corrects the CFR, there is no explanation of how or why the error occurred initially.
• The language is formal and regulatory, which may be difficult for individuals not familiar with legal or regulatory terminology to understand.