FR 2025-03985

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to change some rules for gas companies about how much they can charge and when they need to give money back. People are allowed to say if they think it's a good or bad idea, and they can get help if they need it to share their thoughts.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has received several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. Kern River Gas Transmission Company submitted a rate filing to be effective April 7, 2025, while RH energytrans, LLC requested a waiver concerning a filing requirement. Additionally, compliance filings and tariff amendments were made by Enable Gas Transmission, LLC, Viking Gas Transmission Company, and Adelphia Gateway, LLC. Public comments and protests must be submitted by specified deadlines, and the public can seek help from FERC’s Office of Public Participation for assistance with the filing process.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 11964
Document #: 2025-03985
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11964-11965

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding the receipt of several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. Specifically, Kern River Gas Transmission Company has submitted a rate filing intended to take effect in April 2025, while RH energytrans, LLC has requested a waiver concerning a filing requirement. In addition, there are compliance filings and tariff amendments made by companies such as Enable Gas Transmission, LLC, Viking Gas Transmission Company, and Adelphia Gateway, LLC.

General Summary

The document outlines various procedural actions being taken within the realm of natural gas pipeline management, which include rate adjustments and compliance with existing regulatory standards. The primary purpose of this notice is to alert stakeholders and the public about these filings and to provide deadlines for public comments or protests.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable issue is the complexity and specialized language used throughout the document. The text includes various technical jargon and specific regulatory references that may not be easily understood by the general public. This can limit transparency and the ability for average citizens to fully comprehend the implications of these proceedings. Furthermore, elements such as the HTML encoding in terms like "FL&U" might be confusing without additional context or explanation.

Additionally, the document lacks meaningful details on the potential impacts of these rate filings or requests. Without understanding the practical consequences, stakeholders and the public may find it challenging to judge the importance of these regulatory changes.

Public Impact

Broadly speaking, the proceedings addressed in this document could impact natural gas pricing and service delivery across regions serviced by the companies involved. However, without clear explanations of what these changes entail, it's difficult for the public to grasp the ramifications for household energy prices or regional energy markets.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For businesses and individuals directly involved in or affected by these energy markets, the notice presents specific deadlines for submitting comments or protests, thereby allowing these stakeholders to voice their concerns or support. The document underscores the importance of understanding procedural rules for those wishing to become parties to the proceedings.

Additionally, entities such as landowners, community organizations, and indigenous groups, who might be directly affected by the operational changes in the pipeline infrastructure, are encouraged to partake in the process. The Office of Public Participation offers assistance, which could be beneficial, but only if those stakeholders are aware of its existence and function.

Ultimately, while the document marks a step in regulatory transparency, its effectiveness is hindered by the lack of accessibility in language and context. More detailed explanations and simplification of terms would greatly benefit public comprehension and engagement.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide any information related to spending or financial transactions, making it difficult to audit for wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The document uses technical jargon and references specific regulatory filing requirements, which may be difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • The description containing HTML encoding, 'FL&U', might be unclear for some readers unfamiliar with coding or specific terminologies.

  • • The document does not explain what the various docket numbers signify or how they relate to each proceeding, potentially confusing those who are not familiar with FERC procedures.

  • • The document lacks an abstract or summary to provide a concise overview of the notice's contents, which could aid reader comprehension.

  • • There is no specific information provided on the potential impact or significance of the rate filings and requests outlined, which might limit public understanding of their importance.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 691
Sentences: 41
Entities: 80

Language

Nouns: 224
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 20
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 73

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.89
Average Sentence Length:
16.85
Token Entropy:
4.86
Readability (ARI):
17.63

Reading Time

about 2 minutes