FR 2025-03952

Overview

Title

North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council will have a meeting on May 12, 2025, where people can talk about fishery rules. Folks can join from a special place in Alaska or from their computers at home.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service announced a public hybrid meeting of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Fishery Monitoring Advisory Committee (FMAC) on May 12, 2025, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Alaska Time. Participants can attend the meeting at the Council's office in Anchorage, Alaska, or join online. The agenda will cover the 2024 Observer Annual report, NMFS updates, budget discussions, and other business matters. Public comments are welcomed and should be submitted electronically via the link provided.

Abstract

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Fishery Monitoring Advisory Committee (FMAC) will meet May 12, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 11945
Document #: 2025-03952
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11945-11945

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register entry under discussion details a public meeting notice issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service. This meeting pertains specifically to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (NPFMC) Fishery Monitoring Advisory Committee, slated for May 12, 2025. The meeting is notable for being a hybrid event, allowing for both in-person attendance in Anchorage, Alaska, and online participation. The agenda focuses on the review of the 2024 Observer Annual report, updates from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), relevant budget discussions, and other business matters.


General Summary

This document outlines an upcoming meeting designed to provide updates and gather input from stakeholders on fishery monitoring efforts in the North Pacific region. By offering insights into recent NMFS activities and budget considerations, it serves as both an informative session and a platform for public participation. The meeting's hybrid nature aims to increase accessibility, inviting broader participation from different geographic regions.


Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues emerge within the document:

  • Complex URLs and Access Information: The document provides URLs to access the meeting and submit public comments. These URLs appear complex and could pose a challenge for users less familiar with entering lengthy web addresses. Moreover, the detailed connection information necessary for joining the online meeting is not provided directly in the notice but rather indicated to be posted at a later stage online.

  • Technical Jargon: The use of terms such as "FMAC" (Fishery Monitoring Advisory Committee) and references to specific reports like the "2024 Observer Annual report" might be confusing for individuals not well-versed with NPFMC activities or the fisheries management realm.

  • Internet Accessibility: The reliance on web links for further information and public comment submission assumes internet accessibility and some level of digital literacy, which isn't universal and may exclude some participants from engaging in the process.

  • Transparency and Financial Considerations: While the document hints at budget discussions in the meeting, it does not clearly outline how these considerations relate to broader concerns or address financial transparency expectations.


Impact on the Public

The hybrid meeting format indicates a positive move towards inclusivity. It allows people from diverse locations, who might otherwise be unable to attend in person, to participate. However, the complexity of accessing online meetings and comment submission limits this inclusivity for individuals without stable internet access or those unfamiliar with technological processes.

Additionally, the document sets a channel for the public to offer input on fishery management, which could potentially influence decisions affecting marine conservation efforts and local economies dependent on fishing. However, the perceived barriers to accessibility may dampen the public's ability to engage effectively.


Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Fisheries and Environmental Advocacy Groups: These groups might find the meeting invaluable as it discusses critical updates and reports, potentially affecting conservation policies and fishing regulations. Participation could allow these stakeholders to voice concerns and suggest improvements to current practices.

Local Fishermen and Fisheries-Dependent Communities: Insights into NMFS budget decisions and business discussions could significantly impact those whose livelihoods depend on fisheries. Participating in discussions or following meeting outcomes might help them anticipate regulatory changes and adjust operations accordingly.

Policy Makers and Researchers: Engaging with the agenda and utilizing the meeting outputs could aid in formulating more effective fisheries management policies and support evidence-based research, ultimately benefiting resource management and sustainability efforts.

In conclusion, while the document's intent of broadening participation through a hybrid meeting format is commendable, issues relating to accessibility and clarity could impede achieving this objective effectively. Stakeholders are encouraged to prepare prior to the meeting to maximize participation and influence outcomes positively.

Issues

  • • The document provides multiple URLs for attending the meeting and submitting public comments, but these URLs are complex and may be difficult for some users to input without error.

  • • The meeting is hybrid, offering both in-person and online attendance. However, the information on how to connect online is insufficiently detailed within the document, as it states that connection information will be posted online but does not provide any specific details directly.

  • • The language used in the document is generally clear, but technical terms such as 'FMAC' and references to documents like the '2024 Observer Annual report' could be confusing to those not familiar with the specific organization or context.

  • • There is no explicit mention of budget or financial considerations related to the meeting, which could be relevant for transparency, especially if the meeting involves significant expenses.

  • • The document relies heavily on links for further information, which may not be accessible to everyone, especially those without reliable internet access or familiarity with navigating online resources.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 400
Sentences: 19
Entities: 44

Language

Nouns: 148
Verbs: 18
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.61
Average Sentence Length:
21.05
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
18.38

Reading Time

about a minute or two