FR 2025-03872

Overview

Title

Metamitron; Pesticide Tolerances

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA has decided that a tiny amount of a chemical called metamitron is okay to be in apples and pears, making sure it's safe for everyone to eat, even kids.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final rule establishing tolerances for the herbicide metamitron residues in apples and pears at 0.01 parts per million. This rule was requested by ADAMA AGAN and is based on the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The EPA conducted an extensive risk assessment and determined that this tolerance is safe for human consumption, including for infants and children, with no significant risks identified. The rule is effective March 11, 2025, and interested parties can file objections or request hearings by May 12, 2025.

Abstract

This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of metamitron in or on apple and pear. ADAMA AGAN c/o Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc. (d/b/a ADAMA) requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

Type: Rule
Citation: 90 FR 11670
Document #: 2025-03872
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11670-11674

AnalysisAI

Commentary

The recent publication in the Federal Register by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) outlines the establishment of new tolerances for the pesticide metamitron, an herbicide that can now have residues in apples and pears up to a maximum of 0.01 parts per million. This decision, effective March 11, 2025, follows a comprehensive assessment process conducted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act at the request of ADAMA AGAN, a recognized entity in pesticide regulation.

Summary of the Document

In essence, the EPA has conducted a thorough evaluation to determine that the pesticide residues from metamitron in certain fruits are safe for human consumption. This includes vulnerable populations like infants and children. The assessment process involved examining potential exposure through food consumption and drinking water, as well as considering any cumulative effects in combination with other substances. The EPA's analysis has concluded that the proposed tolerances do not pose significant risks and are unlikely to contribute to cancer or other chronic health issues.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document is laden with technical terminology and regulatory jargon that may present comprehension challenges to the general public. Terms like "toxicological points of departure," and "quantitative acute dietary exposure" require some level of specialized understanding to fully appreciate their implications. The mention of "estimated drinking water concentrations" may also not immediately convey the intended level of safety to non-expert readers. Moreover, it references other documents and links to additional information sources, which might necessitate further exploration for those interested in a deeper understanding.

The procedural details for objecting to or requesting hearings about this decision, as outlined in the document, are also complex. They involve specific legal or regulatory procedures that may be difficult to navigate for individuals without a legal background.

Impact on the Public

The broad public impact of this regulation lies in its assurance that certain pesticide levels in food are safe. This decision should provide some level of comfort to consumers who are increasingly concerned about pesticide residues in fruits. The EPA's findings support the notion that there will be minimal health risks associated with metamitron residues at the specified level. It’s important for the public to understand these defenses to maintain trust in market food safety.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Agricultural producers, food manufacturers, and pesticide manufacturers comprise the primary stakeholders for whom this regulation bears significance. For apple and pear growers, this rule provides a clear legal limit for metamitron usage, promoting consistency and possibly easing regulatory compliance efforts.

On the manufacturer's side, ADAMA AGAN, a frontrunner in this petition, benefits positively as their product continues to be viable under U.S. regulations, ensuring continued market presence and potential profit from sales. However, for producers outside ADAMA's network, this development might necessitate adjustments in pesticide management practices or alternative solutions, potentially increasing costs or necessitating changes in operation.

Conclusion

In summary, the decision by the EPA to approve metamitron residues at specified levels enhances regulatory clarity and aims to maintain public health safety, ensure fair trade practices, and support agricultural productivity. Nonetheless, the technical and regulatory intricacies presented in the document indicate a need for agencies to consider more public-friendly communication, helping ensure broader understanding and support.

Issues

  • • The document contains complex scientific language and regulatory references that might be difficult for the general public to understand without specialized knowledge.

  • • Technical terms such as 'toxicological points of departure', 'metabolite desamino-metamitron', 'estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs)', and 'quantitative acute dietary exposure' are used without straightforward explanations, potentially limiting comprehension.

  • • The detailed discussion of various scientific and regulatory assessments may overwhelm readers not familiar with EPA processes and pesticide regulation.

  • • The section discussing pathways for submitting objections or hearing requests (Unit I.C.) is quite detailed and may be difficult to follow for individuals unfamiliar with legal or regulatory procedures.

  • • Reference to other documents and online locations for further information is frequent, which may require readers to access additional materials in order to fully understand and verify the content of the rule.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 5
Words: 5,034
Sentences: 170
Entities: 367

Language

Nouns: 1,713
Verbs: 404
Adjectives: 353
Adverbs: 53
Numbers: 178

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.14
Average Sentence Length:
29.61
Token Entropy:
5.93
Readability (ARI):
21.28

Reading Time

about 19 minutes