FR 2025-03722

Overview

Title

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. government (like a big group of grown-ups who make rules) has decided one person did something wrong, so they put this person on a special 'not allowed' list. This means no one in the U.S. is supposed to give them money or buy things from them.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has added a person to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. This decision was made because the person met the criteria set out in Executive Order 14059 related to global illicit drug trade sanctions. As a result, all their property and interests within U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. citizens are generally not allowed to have financial dealings with them. The decision was issued on March 4, 2025.

Abstract

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of one person that has been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this person are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 11581
Document #: 2025-03722
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11581-11583

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a formal notice from the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), announcing that an individual has been added to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). This action was determined based on the person's involvement in global illicit drug trade activities, as outlined in Executive Order 14059. Such designations result in blocking the individual's property and interests that fall under U.S. jurisdiction, and they effectively prohibit U.S. citizens from conducting business with the said individual. The order was issued on March 4, 2025.

Summary of the Document

The document serves to inform the public and relevant parties that an individual has been sanctioned due to their involvement in the global illicit drug trade. The name of the person, however, is not mentioned, limiting transparency. The sanctions are based on the criteria specified in Executive Order 14059, aimed at targets associated with certain illicit activities. The notice emphasizes that U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing with this individual, stressing the seriousness of the sanction.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One of the most notable issues with this notice is the lack of specificity concerning the individual placed on the SDN List. The absence of a name may hinder stakeholders who require clarity regarding with whom they may no longer interact. Additionally, the document does not elaborate on which specific criteria or evidence led to the designation under Executive Order 14059. This lack of detailed context might frustrate those seeking to understand the justification behind such a significant action.

Moreover, the notice references Executive Order 14059 but fails to summarize the pertinent sections, which might prevent readers from fully understanding the legal framework at play. The instructions regarding the dates mentioned also appear incomplete, potentially causing confusion about the timeline of the action taken. Furthermore, the mentioned billing codes are unexplained, which could leave readers unfamiliar with federal register publications unclear about their relevance.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the document signifies the U.S. Treasury’s ongoing efforts to combat global illicit activities through financial restrictions. For the general public, this reflects a broader strategy to safeguard the financial system from sovereign exploit and unlawful uses. However, the lack of specific information within the notice might limit public engagement and understanding.

For stakeholders, particularly those in finance, international trade, or legal compliance sectors, the impact of this notice is potentially more profound. Financial institutions and businesses need to be aware of new entries on the SDN List to avoid unintentional violations of U.S. sanctions law. Without specific details, these stakeholders might find it challenging to assess risks accurately or adjust their due diligence processes, which could lead to regulatory or reputational risks.

Conclusion

While the document fulfills its fundamental purpose of notifying the public and relevant bodies of a new sanction, its minimal detail and transparency issues may undermine its effectiveness. While it holds significance for compliance officials and U.S. businesses involved in international operations, the omissions potentially complicate their ability to take expedient and informed action. Overall, while the notice aligns with the government's strategy to enforce economic sanctions, its execution could be refined to enhance clarity and utility.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the name of the person being sanctioned, which could reduce transparency and clarity for stakeholders.

  • • There is no detailed explanation provided regarding the specific criteria that were met for the imposition of sanctions, making it difficult to understand the rationale behind the designation.

  • • The document references Executive Order 14059 but does not provide a summary or details of the relevant sections, which could be useful for context.

  • • The language used in the 'DATES' section is unclear or seemingly incomplete ('See **Supplementary Information** for relevant dates'), leaving potential ambiguity about what specific dates are being referred to.

  • • The billing codes 'BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P' and 'BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C' are touched upon but not explained, possibly affecting understanding for readers unfamiliar with such codes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 352
Sentences: 12
Entities: 36

Language

Nouns: 127
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.86
Average Sentence Length:
29.33
Token Entropy:
4.81
Readability (ARI):
19.20

Reading Time

about a minute or two