FR 2025-03673

Overview

Title

City of Idaho Falls, Idaho; Notice of Application for a License Variance Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The City of Idaho Falls wants to change how much water flows through a river for a little while so they can fix a dam, and people can tell the government if they have any thoughts about it before the end of March.

Summary AI

The City of Idaho Falls, Idaho has filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requesting a temporary change to the required minimum water flow at the Idaho Falls Hydroelectric Project. This change is needed to build a temporary dam so maintenance work can be done on the project. During this time, some parts of the Snake River will be temporarily emptied of water. The public and agencies are invited to submit comments or requests to be part of the decision-making process by March 31, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 11530
Document #: 2025-03673
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11530-11531

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register discusses an application by the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, seeking a temporary exemption from maintaining the usual minimum water flow in part of the Snake River. This request is related to the Idaho Falls Hydroelectric Project and is intended to facilitate essential maintenance work. Public input and participation in the decision-making process through comments, motions to intervene, or protests are welcomed until March 31, 2025.

Summary of the Document

This notice pertains to a temporary modification at the Idaho Falls Hydroelectric Project, located on the Snake River in Bonneville County, Idaho. The primary purpose of the proposal is to temporarily reduce the minimum water flow to allow for the construction of a cofferdam. This structure will enable maintenance work on the dam's "pelican gates," critical components of the hydroelectric operation. The reduction in water flow will affect about 1,100 feet of riverbed, to be dewatered from July to early December 2025. The aim is to repair these gates, improve the operation, and implement environmental best practices during the process.

Significant Issues or Concerns

  1. Understanding Legal and Technical Terms: The document relies on specialized legal references and complex hydroelectric operations terminology, which could be confusing for the general public. Terms like "minimum bypass flow" and references to specific Federal regulations might not be easily understood without prior knowledge.

  2. Filing and Participation Procedures: The document outlines a detailed process for public comments and participation, requiring familiarity with FERC's digital filing systems. Those unfamiliar with these systems—or without internet access—might find it challenging to engage in the process fully.

  3. Exclusion of Cooperating Agencies: The document indicates that while agencies can cooperate in creating environmental documents, they cannot intervene in the decision-making process, potentially leading to confusion about their roles and influence.

Impact on the Public

The public, particularly those living near the Snake River or who use it for recreation or livelihood, might experience short-term impacts due to the temporary reduction of water flow. Environmental and aesthetic changes could affect local ecosystems and communities. Therefore, public awareness and understanding of the project, its purposes, and its impacts are crucial.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  1. Local Residents and Businesses: Those residing or operating businesses near the affected river segment may encounter temporary disruptions, particularly if they rely on the river for activities like fishing or tourism. The project aims to mitigate environmental impacts by relocating stranded fish and enhancing fish spawning grounds to ensure these resources are maintained.

  2. Environmental and Government Agencies: While agencies can provide input and expertise, their inability to intervene might limit their influence on final decisions. This restriction could be seen as a hindrance to robust environmental advocacy, potentially impacting the efficacy of their environmental protection goals.

  3. Hydroelectric Project Operators: The maintenance work facilitated by this variance is likely essential to the project's long-term functionality and safety. Successful repairs and updates can enhance the project's efficiency and reliability, benefiting energy consumers and the local economy in the long term.

Conclusion

Overall, while the document outlines a necessary and temporary measure for crucial maintenance at the Idaho Falls Hydroelectric Project, it underscores the importance of clear communication, accessible participation methods, and transparent decision-making processes to ensure that all stakeholders, particularly the public, can engage meaningfully in the regulatory process.

Issues

  • • The document assumes familiarity with specific legal and procedural references (e.g., Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r, and various 18 CFR rules) that may not be clear to all readers.

  • • The instructions for filing comments, motions, or protests rely heavily on understanding of FERC's filing systems and procedures, which might be complicated for the general public.

  • • There is a reliance on electronic systems (eFiling, eComment) which may exclude individuals without internet access or those unfamiliar with digital technology.

  • • The explanation of the temporary variance request, including terms like 'minimum bypass flow' and 'pelican gates,' may be unclear or too technical for readers unfamiliar with hydroelectric operations.

  • • It's not clearly stated why the variance is necessary beyond facilitating maintenance activities; additional context on the environmental or operational necessity would be helpful.

  • • The call for cooperation from agencies on environmental documents could be seen as exclusionary since those entities then cannot intervene, which may not be immediately clear to involved parties.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,346
Sentences: 55
Entities: 105

Language

Nouns: 439
Verbs: 116
Adjectives: 46
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 71

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.61
Average Sentence Length:
24.47
Token Entropy:
5.41
Readability (ARI):
20.82

Reading Time

about 5 minutes