FR 2025-03655

Overview

Title

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum Environmental Research Forum

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Petroleum Environmental Research Forum is telling everyone that Arcadis U.S., Inc has joined them as a new friend, which helps follow special rules to keep everything fair when working together.

Summary AI

The Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (PERF) filed a notice with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission about changes in its membership, specifically adding Arcadis U.S., Inc from Highlands Ranch, CO, as a new member. This filing is in accordance with the National Cooperative Research and Production Act, which limits antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages in certain cases. There are no other changes to the membership or activities of PERF, but the group plans to continue updating its membership filings in the future.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 11550
Document #: 2025-03655
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11550-11550

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The document is a formal notice from the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (PERF) filed with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This notice reports a change in membership under the rules of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. Specifically, it announces the addition of Arcadis U.S., Inc., a company based in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, to the PERF. The act cited aims to limit the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages in certain legally defined scenarios. No other changes in PERF's membership or activities were reported.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One concern in the document is the lack of explanation or reasoning behind the addition of Arcadis U.S., Inc. as a new member to the PERF. This absence of context might prompt questions around the selection process and whether it is equitable or if favoritism might be involved. Additionally, the legalese employed, such as the references to specific sections of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act, may not be easily understandable for the layperson. This could lead to confusion about the full implications of the notice.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the notice primarily serves as a matter of record and transparency regarding changes in the composition of the PERF. While not directly affecting everyday life, such notices ensure compliance with laws intended to promote fair competition in research and production activities. It also reflects legal structures designed to balance collaborative industry efforts with antitrust safeguards.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • PERF Members and Arcadis U.S., Inc.: The addition of Arcadis U.S., Inc. to the PERF may bring new expertise and resources, potentially enhancing the group's research capabilities and broadening its collaborative projects.

  • Regulatory Bodies: For entities like the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, such filings help monitor and manage cooperative activities, ensuring they do not impede competition.

Negative Impacts:

  • Potential Competitors: Other companies not included in the PERF might view the collaboration as a competitive disadvantage if it leads to advancements not accessible to them.

Overall, the document highlights an ongoing effort by regulatory bodies to oversee cooperative ventures in the industry while balancing legal protections. The notice contributes to maintaining transparency and adherence to antitrust laws, although it does so in a manner that may require further elaboration for broader public understanding.

Issues

  • • The document does not contain any information about spending, so potential wasteful spending cannot be assessed.

  • • The notice mentions the addition of Arcadis U.S., Inc as a new member to the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum but does not provide context or reasoning for the addition, which might raise questions of favoritism.

  • • The document refers to 'section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933' and 'section 6(b) of the Act' without providing summaries or context, which might be unclear to readers unfamiliar with these sections.

  • • There is mention of a change in membership being disclosed to limit the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages, but the legal implications of this are not explained in layman's terms, potentially making it difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • The document uses complex legal references (e.g., '15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.') that may be difficult for non-experts to comprehend without additional explanation.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 297
Sentences: 12
Entities: 29

Language

Nouns: 95
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.85
Average Sentence Length:
24.75
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
17.29

Reading Time

about a minute or two