FR 2025-03628

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Notice of Disagreement: Appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Board of Veterans' Appeals wants to change the way they collect feedback from veterans about decisions they don't agree with, using some special forms to make it easier, and they're asking people to share their thoughts on these changes.

Summary AI

The Board of Veterans' Appeals in the Department of Veterans Affairs has announced a proposed information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice is about the collection entitled "Decision Review Request: Board Appeal (Notice of Disagreement)" and involves the use of two VA forms: VA Form 10182 for modernized appeals and VA Form 9 for legacy appeals. The purpose is to revise the current data collection due to changes in the estimated number of respondents and burden hours. This submission is being reviewed for public comments and must display a valid OMB control number to proceed.

Abstract

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, this notice announces that the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and burden, and it includes the actual data collection instrument.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 11461
Document #: 2025-03628
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 11461-11462

AnalysisAI

The document titled "Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Notice of Disagreement: Appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals" outlines a significant undertaking by the Department of Veterans Affairs, specifically its Board of Veterans' Appeals. The initiative seeks to streamline the process of veterans' appeals by revising data collection methods under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The focus is on the use of two specific VA forms that facilitate appeals: VA Form 10182 for modernized systems and VA Form 9 for legacy cases. This initiative is currently under review and open for public comment as part of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) procedures.

General Summary

The document indicates that the Board of Veterans' Appeals is seeking public comments on a proposed information collection method involving the forms mentioned above. This procedure is an essential function under the Paperwork Reduction Act, aimed at ensuring that any data collection by government agencies is necessary and not overly burdensome to the public. The Board's submission describes how the forms will be used, particularly in light of changes following the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (AMA). The act mandates a modernized review system for veterans' appeals, which now requires different forms based on whether the appeal pertains to modern or legacy cases.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are a few issues and concerns brought to light by this notice. The document references a decrease in the use of VA Form 9 but lacks detailed context explaining why this change occurred. This gap in information could leave readers pondering what factors led to the shift in usage. Furthermore, the document references highly technical aspects of the appeals process, such as terms like "Decision Review Request: Board Appeal (Notice of Disagreement)." These might be challenging for people without a legal or military background to comprehend. Simplifying the language or providing clear definitions could make the document more accessible.

Moreover, the document references the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 without explaining what the act encompasses, assuming prior knowledge among readers. Additionally, while the document mentions a previous comment period, it does not provide insights into any feedback or adjustments that resulted from it.

Impact on the Public Broadly

Broadly, this document represents an effort to ensure the veterans' appeal process is efficient and accommodating of the changes brought about by recent legislation. The focus on revising the data collection process implies a commitment to minimizing the burden on veterans when filing appeals, potentially making the process faster and more transparent.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For specific stakeholders such as veterans, this documents holds significant importance. Veterans seeking to appeal benefits decisions are the primary beneficiaries of these procedural changes. The modernization of the appeal process, particularly after more recent legislation, aims to streamline their interactions with the VA, possibly leading to expedited review times and resolutions of their claims.

On the flip side, there might be some adjustment challenges for veterans service organizations and legal representatives who assist veterans in appeals. They will need to familiarize themselves with the revised procedures and the use of new forms. This transition, though potentially daunting initially due to the need for adaptation, may ultimately yield efficiencies and better outcomes for veterans seeking benefits.

Issues

  • • The document could include more detailed information on why there has been a decrease in the use of VA Form 9, offering a more transparent view of changes in respondent behavior.

  • • The language and structure used in describing the processes, such as 'Decision Review Request: Board Appeal (Notice of Disagreement)', might be complex for some readers. Simplifying this could improve clarity.

  • • The mention of the 'Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (AMA)' lacks a brief explanation about what it entails, potentially making it hard for readers unfamiliar with the act.

  • • The document states that a 'Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published at 89 FR 101691, December 16, 2024', but does not provide details on the outcomes or any changes made based on comments received.

  • • The language regarding 'withdrawal of services by a representative', 'requests for changes in hearing dates', and 'motions for reconsideration', while technical, might benefit from examples or simplified explanations for the general public.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 782
Sentences: 31
Entities: 63

Language

Nouns: 271
Verbs: 51
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.29
Average Sentence Length:
25.23
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
19.44

Reading Time

about 2 minutes