FR 2025-03610

Phillips 66 Company has submitted a notification for proposed production of renewable fuels at its facility in Linden, New Jersey. The proposal falls under Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) Subzone 49E, according to the regulations outlined by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board. This notice announces the intention to produce several renewable energy products, specifically Renewable Diesel, Sustainable Aviation Fuel, Renewable Naphtha, and Renewable Gasoline.

General Summary

The document serves as a formal notice of Phillips 66 Company's plans to expand its production capabilities to include renewable energy products at its facility within the designated FTZ Subzone in Linden. It outlines the technical framework within which this activity will occur, consistent with FTZ procedures. The public is encouraged to review the proposal and submit comments by April 15, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues emerge from the document that warrant attention:

• Lack of Detail on Materials: The document does not specify the foreign-status materials involved in the proposed production activity. This omission makes it challenging to evaluate the full economic, environmental, and regulatory impacts of the project accurately.

• Benefits and FTZ Procedures: While it is mentioned that there are benefits to conducting production under FTZ procedures, the document does not elaborate on what these benefits are. Readers must visit the Foreign-Trade Zones Board's website to obtain detailed information, which could be a barrier to fully understanding the implications of the proposal.

• Technical Language: Terms like "FTZ Subzone 49E" and the specific duty rate of "10.5 cents/barrel" may not be immediately accessible to the general public or those unfamiliar with customs and international trade terminology.

• Environmental and Regulatory Concerns: There is no discussion regarding the potential environmental impact and regulatory compliance related to renewable fuels production. This omission may be a point of concern for the public and other stakeholders focused on sustainability and ecological issues.

• Public Comment Process: While the document invites public comment, it does not clarify how these comments will be utilized in the decision-making process, leaving ambiguity about the influence and role of public opinion.

Public Impact

For the general public, the expansion of renewable fuel production is relevant as it could contribute to broader efforts to transition towards more sustainable energy sources. These efforts might help reduce environmental pollution and reliance on traditional fossil fuels, benefiting environmental and public health in the long term.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

• For Phillips 66 Company: This proposal could enhance their competitive edge in the renewable energy sector, potentially increasing profitability and market share in a growing industry.

• Local Community and Workforce: The proposal might create new job opportunities and stimulate local economic activity, contributing positively to the area's socioeconomic development.

• Environmental Advocates and Regulators: Without clear insights into the environmental implications, stakeholders focused on sustainability may have reservations. They may demand more transparency and robust review processes to ensure that ecological considerations are addressed adequately.

In summary, while the proposal by Phillips 66 to engage in renewable fuel production signifies progress towards more sustainable energy practices, several issues regarding transparency, environmental impact, and public engagement remain unaddressed. These factors are crucial for informed public participation and trust in the decision-making process.