Overview
Title
Facilitating Opportunities for Advanced Air Mobility
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FCC wants to change some rules about how we use airwaves so new flying machines, like drones, can work better. This includes letting them use new parts of the airwaves and updating old rules, but some people are worried it might not be fair or could make things more expensive for others.
Summary AI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed changes to rules for managing spectrum bands with the aim of promoting Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS). This proposed rule covers three main areas: opening the 450 MHz band for broader aeronautical operations and spectrum flexibility, allowing enhanced UAS detection in the 24.45-24.65 GHz band, and updating power rules for Commercial Aviation Air-Ground Systems in the 849-851 MHz and 894-896 MHz bands. The FCC seeks public comments by April 16, 2025, to further refine these proposals aimed at improving wireless communications and supporting emerging aviation technologies.
Abstract
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) proposes and seeks comment on changes to the rules that govern the operations of three distinct bands of spectrum, modernizing rules to facilitate opportunities for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS). First, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposes and seeks comment on opening up the 450 MHz band to aeronautical command and control operations; allowing for a single, nationwide license in the band; and adopting flexible licensing, operating, and technical rules that will facilitate robust use of the band at a range of altitudes while minimizing interference to neighboring operations. It also proposes expanding radiolocation operations in the 24.45-24.65 GHz band for uncrewed aircraft system detection operations. Finally, the NPRM proposes to modernize the Commission's legacy power rules for Commercial Aviation Air-Ground Systems in the 849-851 and 894-896 MHz band, which is used for in-flight connectivity.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed changes to its rules governing the usage of certain spectrum bands in the United States. These changes are aimed at facilitating the growth and operation of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS). Specifically, the proposed rules address three significant areas:
Utilization of the 450 MHz Band: The FCC aims to open up the 450 MHz band for broader aeronautical operations, allowing for a single nationwide license that could enable more flexible use of the spectrum.
Enhanced UAS Detection: The Commission is proposing to allow radiolocation operations in the 24.45-24.65 GHz band, which could facilitate the detection of UAS, particularly in sensitive areas.
Updated Power Rules for Air-Ground Systems: The FCC intends to modernize the power rules for Commercial Aviation Air-Ground Systems in the 849-851 MHz and 894-896 MHz bands, shifting from peak power to average power measurement, and aligning these rules with similar technologies.
Public comments on these proposals are being solicited until April 16, 2025.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Favored Incumbents: One major issue with the proposal is the possibility of favoritism. AURA Network Systems OpCo, LLC, currently the only licensee, stands to benefit from the new rule proposing a single nationwide license for the 450 MHz band. This raises potential concerns about competition and whether the playing field is level for other potential participants.
Spectrum Value and Windfalls: The changes in licensing rules and power regulations could increase the value of the spectrum. However, by potentially not requiring windfall payments, the FCC could unintentionally enrich current license holders. This lack of financial checks could suggest an imbalance in economic benefits.
Complexity and Accessibility: The technical language used throughout the document may pose comprehension challenges for the general public, making it difficult for them to engage fully with or comment on the proposals. Moreover, some terms, such as "covered incumbent," are not clearly defined at the outset, creating potential confusion over eligibility and applicability.
Interference and Public Safety: Although interference management is discussed, the FCC has not thoroughly addressed APCO's concerns about interference with public safety communications. This may leave public safety stakeholders dissatisfied, especially without a clear plan to prevent or resolve interference.
Public Impact
The proposed rules could significantly affect how air mobility technologies evolve in the United States. Broad public interest might see benefits in improved and more extensive UAS operations and better air connectivity services. However, the shift to a nationwide license could stifle smaller or new entrants who could bring innovation and competitive pricing.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
AURA Network Systems OpCo, LLC: As the current incumbent, AURA stands to gain the most from the changes, potentially being positioned as a primary player in nationwide operations without facing new competition.
Public Safety Organizations: There might be negative implications if FCC does not adequately address interference management. APCO's concerns denote a risk of public safety operations being compromised.
Small Businesses and New Market Entrants: The proposal to transition to a nationwide licensing model could exclude smaller entities unable to meet the proposed eligibility criteria, limiting market diversity and innovation.
Regulatory Compliance: With proposals requiring the submission of electronic coverage maps and documentation, there could be substantial compliance burdens, particularly for smaller entities that may lack the resources for additional administrative tasks.
Overall, while the FCC's proposals have promising aspects for advancing technology, they also present significant concerns regarding equity, competition, and regulatory transparency. The public and stakeholders are encouraged to contribute to the discussion to ensure a balanced outcome that facilitates innovation while safeguarding fairness and public safety.
Financial Assessment
The document outlines various regulatory changes proposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to modernize rules and facilitate opportunities for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS). Financially, the document touches on several points that are crucial when considering the economic impact and financial implications of these changes.
Financial Growth of UAS Market
The document anticipates robust growth in the UAS market. Specifically, it mentions that the market is expected to grow at a rate of 14.6 percent and to be valued between $29 billion and $54.2 billion by 2027. This projected growth underscores the economic importance of regulating these systems effectively, ensuring that the benefits of expanded capabilities and innovation are realized.
Definition of Small Business
Regarding small businesses, the document outlines the criteria set by the FCC and the Small Business Administration (SBA). For auction purposes, a "small business" is defined as having average gross revenues not exceeding $40 million over the prior three years, while a "very small business" should not exceed $15 million annually over the same period. Additionally, firms in the "All Other Telecommunications" category are considered small if their annual receipts are $40 million or less. These definitions are critical for understanding which entities could potentially benefit from bidding credits and other regulatory advantages.
IRS Revenue Benchmarks
Financial thresholds from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are also highlighted, using a revenue benchmark of $50,000 or less to delineate annual electronic filing requirements for small exempt organizations. Nationwide, approximately 530,109 small exempt organizations report revenues below this threshold, which emphasizes the breadth of small entities potentially affected by new regulations.
Potential for Undue Enrichment
The document raises concerns over the potential for undue enrichment, especially in the context of transitioning to nationwide licenses. The proposal for license modification could lead to an increase in spectrum value without corresponding windfall payments, which might result in unfair financial advantages for current licensees, such as AURA Network Systems OpCo, LLC. The proposal seeks comments on whether a mandatory payment to the U.S. Treasury should be enforced to mitigate any unfair financial benefit, especially given the possibility of increased deployment flexibility and exclusive-use licenses raising the spectrum's value.
Issues Related to Financial References
Several issues are identified concerning the financial mechanisms laid out in the proposals. The concern about favoritism or lack of competition surfaces due to the potential benefits exclusive to AURA, the sole incumbent licensee. This could sideline other potential players unable to meet stringent eligibility criteria, resulting in limited competition and potential efficiency gains. Furthermore, the financial analyses provided do not delve deeply into how these changes might impact the broader market or smaller entities, particularly with administrative burdens like submitting compliance reporting.
The document's proposed rule changes suggest significant financial implications for various stakeholders, particularly small businesses and incumbent licensees, with concerns about fairness and economic impact playing a pivotal role in the commentary. The projected growth and specific financial criteria highlight the need for careful consideration of how these rules affect different market participants financially.
Issues
• The document proposes significant changes to the 450 MHz band, potentially benefiting AURA Network Systems OpCo, LLC, the only incumbent licensee, by granting a single nationwide license. This could raise concerns about favoritism or lack of competition.
• The proposed changes to licensing and power rules could inadvertently create undue enrichment for current licensees, especially if a windfall payment is not required despite the increase in spectrum value.
• The language used to describe allocation and technical proposals is complex and may be difficult for the general public to understand without technical expertise.
• The document proposes changes that might increase spectrum value or provide 'windfalls' to certain entities without detailed cost-benefit analyses to justify these proposals.
• The use of terms like 'covered incumbent' without clear initial definition in the document could lead to ambiguity in understanding who qualifies.
• Potential issues with interference management and compliance assurances are noted, but the methods to address these may not be fully detailed, leaving room for interpretation.
• APCO's petition for reconsideration regarding potential interference to public safety operations is not addressed in detail, which could be a concern for affected parties.
• The proposal mentions voluntary transitioning to a nationwide license which could be inequitable for smaller players who cannot meet eligibility criteria, effectively locking them out.
• The NPRM's proposal for submitting electronic coverage maps and other compliance reporting could impose significant administrative burdens, especially on small entities without commensurate justification.