Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission got some papers about gas companies that want to change prices and how they pay back money. People can tell the Commission what they think about these changes by a certain date.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received several natural gas pipeline rate and refund report filings. These include filings from companies like Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Honeoye Storage Corporation, and others, with different proposed effective dates. People interested in participating in these proceedings, whether to protest, intervene, or file complaints, must do so by specific deadlines. Detailed information and assistance about these filings are available on the Commission's website, and help is offered by the Office of Public Participation.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) detailing a series of filings related to natural gas pipelines. These filings are primarily concerned with rate changes, agreements, and compliance, submitted by various organizations, including the Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Honeoye Storage Corporation. Each company has set different effective dates for their filings, and the Commission invites public participation in the form of interventions, protests, or complaints by specific deadlines.
Summary of Document
The document provides a list of filings that have been submitted to FERC. These filings, identified by docket numbers, involve rate adjustments and agreements within the natural gas pipeline sector. The specifics of each filing are briefly described, and they are associated with a timeline for their expected impact. The document also outlines the processes through which stakeholders, including the general public, can engage with or contest these filings.
Significant Issues or Concerns
A noticeable issue is the document's reliance on technical jargon and references to specific regulatory codes, such as § 284.123 and § 4(d). This could present readability challenges for individuals who do not possess a background in legal or regulatory affairs. Moreover, the notice lacks detailed explanations regarding the financial implications or broader societal impact of these filings, which might obscure their significance for lay readers.
Additionally, while the document is thorough in listing the procedural steps for interventions and protests, it may not be immediately clear or accessible to those unfamiliar with federal regulatory processes.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The document serves an important role in offering transparent updates on regulatory proceedings that may affect natural gas rates and infrastructure—factors that can, in turn, influence energy costs for consumers. It emphasizes the opportunity for public engagement, allowing individuals and organizations to contribute to the decision-making process. Such engagement is critical in ensuring that diverse voices are heard, particularly when decisions may have widespread economic consequences.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders like natural gas companies, regulatory filings can significantly impact operational and financial planning. Pipeline companies that are subject to these rate filings may need to adjust strategies in response to regulatory compliance requirements. Customers of these services, including both residential and commercial entities, may experience shifts in service costs dependent on the outcomes of these filings.
Consumer advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and other interest groups might find opportunities to influence proceedings through intervention or protest. Their participation could steer outcomes in ways that promote transparency, fairness, and environmental stewardship in the energy sector.
In conclusion, while this document is critical in facilitating regulatory compliance and public oversight, the complexity of its language and content could be a barrier for broader public understanding and meaningful participation. It underscores the need for accessible channels through which all stakeholders can effectively engage in the regulatory process.
Issues
• The document does not specify any monetary amounts involved in these filings, thus it is not possible to assess wasteful spending or favoritism based on this document alone.
• There is no overt evidence of language that favors particular organizations or individuals, but the technical nature and references to specific regulations (e.g., § 284.123, § 4(d)) might not be accessible to all public members.
• The document uses technical language and references specific regulatory codes which may be difficult for non-experts to understand.
• The description of the purpose of each filing is brief, which might lead to ambiguity regarding the implications or importance of each filing.
• Instructions for intervention and protest filing are provided but might not be user-friendly for individuals unfamiliar with the process.
• The document metadata lists 'Energy Department' and 'Federal Energy Regulatory Commission' under 'agency_names', but only the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is directly mentioned in the text, which may cause some confusion.