FR 2025-03243

Overview

Title

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Budget-Based Rent Adjustment Requests and Appeals; OMB Control No.: 2502-0324

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The people in charge of housing want to make sure that rent hikes are fair, so they want to ask folks for advice on how to check if the increases are okay and what to do if someone disagrees. They are also asking people to share their thoughts to make this whole thing work better without making it too hard for everyone.

Summary AI

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to collect information related to budget-based rent adjustment requests and appeals, as explained in their notice. This is part of a process to ensure rent increases are reasonable and to provide a way for owners to appeal denied requests. The public has 30 days to comment on this proposal, and they can find more information or submit comments on the reginfo.gov website. HUD is also inviting comments on various aspects of the information collection to improve its effectiveness and reduce the burden on respondents.

Abstract

HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comments from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days of public comment.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 10932
Document #: 2025-03243
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 10932-10933

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The document from the Federal Register highlights a notice from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which seeks approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to collect information related to budget-based rent adjustment requests and appeals. This proposed information collection is an effort to ensure the reasonableness of rent increases and to allow property owners the opportunity to appeal any denied requests. The notice opens a 30-day window for public comments, during which interested stakeholders can submit their opinions and suggestions via a specified online platform.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document presents several concerns and ambiguities that warrant attention:

  1. Lack of Specific Details: The document does not provide comprehensive details about the budget involved in this information collection, making it challenging to determine if any financial resources could be misallocated.

  2. Impact on Financial Responsibilities: There is insufficient clarity on how this information collection would affect the financial obligations or constraints of the involved parties. This could leave stakeholders uncertain about the implications of the proposed changes.

  3. Vague Description of the Budget Worksheet: The reference to a "budget worksheet" is mentioned without sufficient context or explanation on its role in assessing the reasonableness of rent increases. More details are needed to understand its application fully.

  4. Absence of Financial Figures and Respondent Estimates: The document lacks specific financial figures or estimates regarding the number of respondents expected. Without these details, evaluating the burden and accuracy of the agency's projected estimates is difficult.

  5. Insufficient Guidance for Comment Submission: While the process for submitting comments is outlined, there is a need for clearer instructions on how stakeholders can effectively address concerns or highlight potential biases in the rent adjustment process.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document encourages public involvement in the decision-making process surrounding rent adjustments. By seeking feedback, HUD potentially allows for a more democratic approach to policy implementation, incorporating diverse perspectives that may lead to more equitable outcomes. However, the lack of transparency and detail present in the document might disenfranchise some individuals who may find it challenging to engage without clear guidance or understanding of the financial implications.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Property Owners: For property owners, especially those managing multiple units, this proposal could mean more structured and predictable guidelines for rent adjustments and appeals. If executed properly, this could be beneficial by providing a fair mechanism for challenging denied adjustments. However, the uncertainty surrounding the specifics of the proposal could lead to hesitancy in participating or contributing to the comment process.

Tenants: Tenants may be directly affected by any rent increases that are justified through this process. Adequate checks and balances need to be in place to ensure that any increases are reasonable and not overly burdensome on tenants. The process should be transparent to assure renters that their interests are being considered.

Policy Makers and HUD Staff: The notice implies additional responsibilities for HUD field staff in evaluating rent increase requests. Clear guidelines and defined processes are necessary to ensure that this does not lead to inconsistencies or decisions based solely on administrative discretion, which could undermine the credibility of the process.

In conclusion, while this document represents an opportunity for public participation in shaping rent adjustment policy, it also underscores the need for more detailed information and transparency to ensure effective and equitable outcomes for all parties involved.

Issues

  • • The document lacks specific details about the budget involved in the information collection, making it difficult to assess if there are any potential wasteful expenditures.

  • • It is unclear how the proposed information collection directly impacts the budget constraints or financial responsibilities of the related parties.

  • • The mention of a 'budget worksheet' is vague and does not provide enough specifics about how it will be used to determine the reasonableness of rent increases.

  • • The document does not specify any financial figures or the potential number of respondents, which could affect the assessment of the burden and accuracy of the agency's estimate.

  • • The instructions for submitting comments lack detail on how stakeholders can effectively voice concerns about potential biases or favoritism in the budget-based rent adjustment process.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 717
Sentences: 28
Entities: 48

Language

Nouns: 250
Verbs: 53
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 35

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.35
Average Sentence Length:
25.61
Token Entropy:
5.12
Readability (ARI):
20.03

Reading Time

about 2 minutes