Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is telling people that some companies want to change the prices they charge for gas. They can say what they think about this, but they need to do it by certain dates.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced several filings related to natural gas pipelines. Black Hills/Kansas Gas Utility Company, LLC and Empire Pipeline, Inc. have both submitted rate filings, with Black Hills proposing a rate change effective January 1, 2025, and Empire proposing a fuel tracking rate effective April 1, 2025. Another filing involves Rover Pipeline LLC submitting a compliance correction for NAESB Version 4.0, effective August 1, 2025. People interested in these proceedings can file protests or intervene according to FERC rules by the specified deadlines.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register outlines several important filings related to natural gas pipelines submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These filings pertain to rate adjustments proposed by different companies, including Black Hills/Kansas Gas Utility Company, LLC, and Empire Pipeline, Inc. Additionally, there is a compliance-related filing from Rover Pipeline LLC. Understanding the details and implications of these filings is crucial for stakeholders and the general public.
General Summary
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has recently received filings from natural gas pipeline companies regarding rate changes and compliance matters. Notably, Black Hills/Kansas Gas Utility Company, LLC has proposed a rate update effective January 1, 2025, while Empire Pipeline, Inc. has submitted a filing concerning a fuel tracking rate to take effect on April 1, 2025. Rover Pipeline LLC has also made a compliance filing related to NAESB standards, which will be effective on August 1, 2025.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Complex Terminology and Legal Jargon: The document contains technical language and legal terms, such as section symbols (§) and references to specific regulatory rules, which may not be accessible to a general audience. This complexity can hinder public understanding and engagement.
Scattered Deadlines: The various comment and protest deadlines are spread across different dates without a clear emphasis or summary, possibly leading to confusion or oversight among those interested in participating.
Assumption of Regulatory Familiarity: The procedures for filing interventions or protests reference specific Commission Regulations without explaining them, assuming readers have prior knowledge of these legal frameworks.
Public and Stakeholder Impacts
General Public: For individuals interested in participating in or understanding these proceedings, the document's complexity might be a barrier. There is a need for accessible explanations and summaries to ensure broader public participation and comprehension.
Specific Stakeholders: Entities directly affected by these filings, such as local governments, environmental groups, and community organizations, might find the document crucial for assessing potential impacts on rates and services. However, navigating the legal landscape to effectively participate could be challenging without adequate guidance or resources.
Conclusion
While the document provides essential information about changes to natural gas pipeline rates and compliance updates, its dense legal language and procedural references may limit accessibility for the general public. Efforts to simplify the presentation of deadlines, procedures, and impacts could promote more meaningful public engagement. Providing clearer explanations, along with support from the Office of Public Participation, could help demystify the process for stakeholders and encourage their active involvement in these regulatory matters.
Issues
• The document uses section symbols (§) and legal jargon which might be unclear or difficult for the general public to understand, potentially limiting transparency.
• The document provides information on public participation but uses terminology from legal and regulatory frameworks that might be complex for a lay audience.
• The comment deadlines are spread out across multiple dates without clear summary or emphasis, which could be overlooked by individuals interested in participating.
• The procedure for filing, for example, references to Rules 211, 214, or 206, assumes familiarity with the Commission's Regulations, which might not be accessible to all stakeholders.
• The contact information for assistance from the Office of Public Participation (OPP) is included, but details on how OPP can specifically assist might be unclear to some readers.
• Billing code and document filing references, such as [FR Doc. 2025-03040], might not be relevant or necessary in understanding the content for all readers.