Overview
Title
Monthly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations; Correction
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission found a tiny mistake in how it labeled a boring ID number for some license changes, so they fixed it to make sure everything is right.
Summary AI
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a correction to a notice published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2025. This notice concerns the regular monthly announcement of any amendments to facility operating licenses or combined licenses. The correction involves updating the Docket ID to "NRC-2025-0027" for accuracy. The correction is effective as of February 25, 2025.
Abstract
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice that was published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2025, regarding the publication of the regular monthly notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to be issued, and grants the Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or combined license, as applicable, upon a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a hearing from any person. This action is necessary to correct the NRC Docket ID.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document announced by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) serves as a correction to a prior notice published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2025. The original notice encompassed the regular monthly announcement concerning amendments to facility operating licenses and combined licenses. Integral to such announcements is the accurate referencing of the Docket ID, which has now been corrected in this document to "NRC-2025-0027". This correction officially takes effect on February 25, 2025.
General Summary
This document is essentially a corrective notice issued by the NRC. Its primary function is to rectify an error in the previously issued notice's Docket ID. The correct Docket ID is crucial for anyone wishing to engage with, or submit commentary on, the announcements of amendments to nuclear facility licenses. These amendments are characterized as involving no significant hazards, though individuals are still allowed to request a hearing if they wish to contest or provide input.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The most apparent issue with the document is its vague reference to the original error, which might lead to misunderstandings or confusion concerning the nature of the correction. It merely states that the Docket ID was incorrect but does not specify the original incorrect ID. This lack of transparency can be frustrating for those directly affected or interested in the administrative process.
Additionally, the document outlines how the public can access related documents or contact the NRC but heavily relies on methods such as telephone or email, while lacking an online scheduling system for those who wish to visit the Public Document Room (PDR). This could be inconvenient for some users who prefer online interactions, reflecting a need for modernization in accessing public services.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, particularly those without regular interactions with NRC announcements, the correction might not seem significant. However, anyone keen to participate in regulatory processes or share input on potential nuclear facility changes would find the corrected Docket ID essential since it directs them to the correct procedural and informational pathways.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved in the nuclear energy sector—such as facility operators, regulatory compliance officers, and environmental organizations—this correction holds more weight. Accurate references like the Docket ID ensure that any feedback, requests for hearings, or other participatory actions are appropriately recorded and processed.
Positively, this correction can expedite engagement and reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies resulting from misdirected or misidentified documents and requests. On the negative side, the document’s vague explanation of the correction and lack of online scheduling options could lead to procedural delays or inconveniences for those stakeholders who might require more tech-oriented solutions or clarity.
In conclusion, while the document corrects a likely minor administrative error, its impact on specific stakeholders reinforces the importance of accuracy in bureaucratic processes. The attention towards such details ensures that public participation in regulatory frameworks remains robust and accessible.
Issues
• The document does not specify the precise nature of the correction being made to the NRC Docket ID, aside from the correction itself, which may lead to ambiguity about the original error.
• The document mentions that the PDR requires an appointment, but does not provide online scheduling options, which might be inconvenient for some users.
• The document contains repeated information about different methods of obtaining public documents, which could be streamlined for clarity.