FR 2025-03018

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is checking and changing prices on gas pipelines, and people can tell them what they think or ask to be part of it. You can look at the details if you're curious by going to a special website.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced a variety of natural gas pipeline rate and refund report filings. Entities such as Double E Pipeline, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, and Viking Gas Transmission Company have submitted filings concerning compliance, rate adjustments, and operational transaction reports. Interested individuals must submit their comments or requests to intervene by the specified deadlines in early March 2025 to become involved in these proceedings. The filings can be accessed through FERC's eLibrary, and further information about the process is available on their website.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 10624
Document #: 2025-03018
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 10624-10625

AnalysisAI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released a notice regarding several natural gas pipeline rate and refund report filings initiated by various pipeline companies. These filings encompass a range of compliance and rate adjustments submitted by entities such as Double E Pipeline, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, and Viking Gas Transmission Company. The public and interested parties are given deadlines in early March 2025 to submit comments or intervene in these proceedings. This opportunity for public engagement suggests an interest in transparency and regulatory oversight.

General Summary

This notice is an announcement from FERC detailing a new set of filings related to natural gas pipelines, which includes compliance submissions and proposed rate changes by multiple companies. Each filing is identified by a docket number and outlines the type of submission, the company involved, and the timeline for when comments must be submitted by interested parties.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document's presentation and content. One notable concern is the absence of an abstract, which can provide a concise summary and facilitate quick understanding of the document for readers. Additionally, the document predominantly uses technical language, such as "§ 4(d) Rate Filing" and "compliance filing," potentially alienating or confusing readers without specialized knowledge.

The document also lacks detail on why each filing is necessary or what benefits they might bring. This could lead to ambiguity concerning the filings’ purposes, limiting public understanding of the implications of these changes. Furthermore, there is no evaluation of the possible impacts these filings may have on the environment or consumers, as well as any benefits or drawbacks that may ensue. Without this information, translating technical filings into broader public interest terms becomes difficult.

Public Impact

The document can significantly affect how interested parties engage with regulatory processes. While it invites public participation through comments and interventions, the lack of clarity and detailed context could negatively affect meaningful public involvement. If the general public finds it challenging to interpret these documents, it might discourage active participation and feedback.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in or impacted by the natural gas pipeline sector—such as pipeline companies, consumers, and environmental groups—these filings are crucial. Pipeline companies must adhere to compliance while striving to provide efficient and cost-effective services. Consumers, on the other hand, might be concerned about any potential changes to gas rates and service reliability resulting from these filings.

Environmental and community groups might have vested interests in assessing how these filings line up with broader environmental regulations and community interests. However, without clear assessments or evaluations presented in the notice, these stakeholders may find it challenging to advocate effectively for their concerns.

Overall, the document underscores the complexity of regulatory filings in the energy sector and highlights the necessity for clearer, more accessible communication from regulatory bodies to better facilitate public understanding and involvement in these critical issues.

Issues

  • • The notice lacks an abstract in the metadata, which can provide a brief overview for easier understanding of the document's content.

  • • The document does not clearly state why each filing is necessary or beneficial, which can lead to ambiguity regarding the purpose of the filings.

  • • The language used in describing the filings, such as '§ 4(d) Rate Filing' and compliance filings, may be complex or technical for the general public to understand without additional context or definition.

  • • There is no evaluation of potential impacts or benefits of the pipeline filings on consumers, stakeholders, or the environment, which could be a concern for transparency and public interest.

  • • The document does not specify why the compliance filings are required, which could be considered a lack of transparency in regulatory processes.

  • • There may be a lack of clarity regarding how public engagement and participation will be facilitated beyond contact information, which could deter meaningful public involvement.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,163
Sentences: 72
Entities: 143

Language

Nouns: 392
Verbs: 45
Adjectives: 28
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 133

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.20
Average Sentence Length:
16.15
Token Entropy:
4.63
Readability (ARI):
18.46

Reading Time

about 4 minutes