FR 2025-02973

Overview

Title

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for New Special Permits

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Transportation has gotten some requests to do special things with dangerous stuff in cars, trains, boats, and planes. They want to know what people think by March 26, 2025, and you can go look at these requests in Washington, DC.

Summary AI

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has announced that it has received various applications for special permits related to hazardous materials transportation. PHMSA is inviting public comments on these applications, which must be submitted by March 26, 2025. The applications can cover different transportation modes, such as motor vehicles, rail freight, cargo vessels, and aircraft. Copies of these applications are available for public inspection at the designated location in Washington, DC.

Abstract

In accordance with the procedures governing the application for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the applications described herein.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 10567
Document #: 2025-02973
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 10567-10567

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document pertains to an announcement by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation. PHMSA has received applications for special permits regarding the transportation of hazardous materials, and it is now calling for public comments on these applications. Interested parties have until March 26, 2025, to submit their comments. These permits cover various modes of transportation, including motor vehicles, rail freight, cargo vessels, and aircraft.

Summary of the Document

The document serves as a formal notification to inform the public and stakeholders about the receipt of applications for special permits related to hazardous materials transportation. The document mentions the procedures for public comment submissions and where these applications can be inspected.

Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document that may impact transparency and accessibility:

  • Lack of Specific Details: The document does not provide specific information about the individual applications for special permits. This can be seen as a lack of transparency, leaving the public in the dark about which permits are under consideration.

  • Comment Submission Requirements: The requirement to submit comments in triplicate is potentially cumbersome. In today's digital age, this can be seen as an outdated practice, possibly limiting the participation of those unable to fulfill this requirement.

  • Limited Public Accessibility: While copies of the applications are available for inspection, the document does not clearly outline how and where the public can view these documents beyond the physical location. This lack of accessibility could hinder effective public engagement.

  • Technical Language: The use of technical language and references specific to Federal regulations might not be easily understood by a general audience, possibly discouraging public participation.

  • Confirmation of Receipt: The process of including a self-addressed stamped postcard for confirmation of comment receipt seems inefficient. An update to allow electronic confirmations would be more modern and environmentally friendly.

Broad Impact on the Public

The document impacts the broader public primarily through its invitation for comments on the applications. Citizens and organizations that might be affected by changes in hazardous materials transportation regulations are given a platform to express their concerns or support. However, the limitations mentioned above might restrict effective public participation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Industry Stakeholders: Businesses involved in the transportation of hazardous materials are likely to be the most affected. The approval or denial of these special permits could substantially impact their operations, either by enabling more efficient transport options or imposing further restrictions and compliance requirements.

  • Environmental and Safety Advocates: These groups may be concerned about the potential risks that come with transporting hazardous substances and may wish to scrutinize and comment on these applications to ensure safety and environmental standards are met.

  • Regulatory Bodies: For the regulatory bodies involved, this document underscores the need for balancing operational efficiency for businesses with public safety and environmental protection.

Overall, while the document represents an essential part of the regulatory process for hazardous materials transportation, it highlights several procedural aspects that could benefit from increased clarity and modernization to facilitate greater public engagement and understanding.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details about which applications for special permits are being considered. This lack of detail could be seen as a lack of transparency.

  • • The addresses section specifies that comments must be submitted in triplicate, which may be unnecessarily burdensome for some stakeholders.

  • • There is no specific information about how the public can access or view the detailed applications for special permits, apart from stating that copies are available for inspection. This could limit public accessibility and engagement.

  • • The document uses technical terms and references specific to the Federal Register and U.S. Code, which might not be easily understandable to the general public.

  • • The step of including a self-addressed stamped postcard for confirmation of receipt of comments could be updated to utilize technology for electronic confirmations, which would be more efficient and environmentally friendly.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 407
Sentences: 15
Entities: 47

Language

Nouns: 160
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.50
Average Sentence Length:
27.13
Token Entropy:
4.64
Readability (ARI):
16.44

Reading Time

about a minute or two