Overview
Title
Information Collections Being Submitted for Review and Approval to Office of Management and Budget
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FCC is asking people to help them find ways to make paperwork simpler, especially for tiny businesses with fewer than 25 employees. They want to make sure that filling out forms doesn't take too long or cost too much.
Summary AI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is seeking public comments on a proposed information collection to reduce paperwork burdens, as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The FCC is particularly interested in feedback on how to decrease the information collection burden for small businesses with fewer than 25 employees. The public is encouraged to submit comments by March 26, 2025, through specified online platforms or via email. This initiative includes reviews of specific FCC forms, such as those dealing with payphone reclassification and volunteer services.
Abstract
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC seeks specific comment on how it might "further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees." The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued a notice seeking public input on a proposed information collection initiative aimed at reducing paperwork burdens. This effort aligns with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and particularly focuses on easing the load for small businesses with fewer than 25 employees. The public is invited to submit their comments by March 26, 2025, via a specified online portal or email. The notice also involves discussions around the review of specific FCC forms, such as those concerning payphone reclassification and volunteer services.
General Overview
This notice is part of the FCC’s ongoing commitment to streamline administrative burdens associated with data collection and compliance, primarily influenced by legislative frameworks like the Paperwork Reduction Act and the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act. The collection initiatives focus on two main areas: compliance with provisions concerning payphones under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and rules around volunteer services agreements.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Broad Estimates for Response Time: The document indicates a wide range of estimated response times, from 0.50 hours to 100 hours, for certain forms. Such broad estimates might reflect complexities in the data collection process, leading to ambiguities about what is required from different respondents.
Technical Language: The use of technical jargon and references to specific legislative acts, such as "47 U.S.C. 276," may pose comprehension barriers for those not well-versed in telecom regulations. This might alienate or confuse stakeholders who do not possess specialized legal or regulatory knowledge.
Cost Implications: While the document mentions "no cost" for the Volunteer Service Agreement Form, indirect costs such as time and resources required to participate or process the forms may not be adequately addressed.
Equitable Impact on Organizations: Smaller organizations could be at a disadvantage, given the multitude of reporting and compliance obligations. Larger entities may have more resources to manage these responsibilities effectively.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
General Public: This initiative underscores a governmental push towards making compliance less burdensome, thereby potentially increasing efficiency and reducing unnecessary processes that can often bog down small businesses and other respondents.
Small Businesses and Individuals: While aimed at easing concerns for small businesses, these entities might still face challenges navigating the specifics of the requirements due to technical language or potential hidden costs. However, successful input from these stakeholders might lead to meaningful changes that could simplify their future interactions with FCC data requirements.
Large Organizations and Carriers: Larger telecom carriers, like Local Exchange Carriers (LECs), are referenced with specific duties, such as billing and disconnection notifications. While these entities are generally expected to handle such obligations, the lack of clarity around cost implications or operational impacts could be a concern, potentially necessitating a call for more detailed regulatory guidance.
Conclusion
While the FCC's initiative is a positive step towards burden reduction, especially for smaller businesses, the method of execution—particularly regarding clarity in estimates, language accessibility, and comprehensive understanding of potential costs—requires further refinement. Stakeholder engagement will be crucial in ensuring that the intended relief is effectively achieved without unintended consequences. This document serves as an invitation for both general and specific feedback, allowing affected parties to shape how these regulatory burdens could better balance necessity against efficiency.
Issues
• The document mentions a range of '0.50-100 hours' as the estimated time per response, which seems excessively broad and could imply inefficiencies or lack of clarity in requirements.
• The document repeatedly uses technical terms and references to specific laws (e.g., '47 U.S.C. 276 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996'), which might be difficult for non-specialist readers to understand.
• The mention of 'no cost' related to the Volunteer Service Agreement Form, FCC Form A-384 might overlook potential indirect costs associated with processing or participating in the program.
• The total annual burden is mentioned as 118,137 hours for one collection and 35 hours for another, but there's no explanation or context provided to assess whether these numbers are reasonable.
• The document outlines multiple obligations and requirements that might favor larger organizations with the resources to comply, potentially disadvantaging smaller entities.
• The document specifies certain actions and responses required by Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) without outlining the potential cost implications or how these might be mitigated.
• There is a lack of information on the actual benefit or outcome of the information collection efforts, making it difficult to assess the necessity or efficiency of the processes.