Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is looking at changes to the prices that some companies want to charge for using big gas pipes, and they're asking people to share their thoughts on it. People interested in knowing more or joining in can get help from FERC's guidance team.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced receipt of several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. Among these are proposed rate changes by Southern California Gas Company, Double E Pipeline, and Rockies Express Pipeline LLC, each with their own effective dates and deadlines for public comment. FERC also noted filings in existing proceedings, such as compliance updates by Hampshire Gas Company and Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC. Interested parties can find more information or participate in these proceedings via FERC's eLibrary system or by contacting the Commission's Office of Public Participation for guidance.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The recent notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) details a series of filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. These filings are essential for maintaining transparency and regulation within the energy sector, ensuring that companies operate within established guidelines. However, the technical nature of the document may present some challenges for the general public, who might not be familiar with the specific legal and procedural jargon used throughout.
Summary of the Document
The document announces the receipt of several filings by FERC from various applicants, including Southern California Gas Company, Double E Pipeline, and Rockies Express Pipeline LLC. Each of these entities has submitted proposals for changes to their rates and agreements, which are slated to become effective on different dates. Furthermore, there are compliance filings from Hampshire Gas Company and Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC, indicating ongoing adjustments within existing proceedings. Responses to these filings, such as comments and protests, must adhere to specific deadlines, as laid out in the document.
Significant Issues or Concerns
A primary concern with the document is its highly technical language, which might be difficult for individuals without a legal or specific domain background to understand. The frequent references to regulatory and legal specifics without accompanying explanations can further complicate comprehension for the public. Moreover, while the document specifies how to protest or intervene, it does not elucidate the broader implications of these actions, which could be vital for those considering participation.
Public Impact
Broadly speaking, these proceedings impact the public by potentially affecting the rates charged by natural gas suppliers, which can influence consumer costs for natural gas. It's important for the public to be aware of these changes as they might directly or indirectly impact household and business energy expenses.
Stakeholder Impact
Several stakeholders are likely to be directly influenced by the contents of this notice. Energy consumers, particularly in areas served by the companies mentioned, might experience changes in their bills depending on the outcome of the rate filings. Regulatory bodies and interest groups may have an interest in ensuring that the filings comply with existing legal standards, and environmental organizations might be interested in how these changes align (or not) with broader environmental and regulatory goals. Additionally, landowners and community groups, particularly those near pipeline routes, may have specific concerns related to the operation and maintenance associated with these filings.
Overall, while the document serves a crucial role in regulatory governance within the energy sector, its accessibility to the general public remains limited due to its technical and procedural depth. For improved public engagement, more accessible summaries and explanations would be beneficial, enabling a more inclusive dialogue on these critical issues.
Issues
• The document does not provide an abstract or a clear overall summary, which might help readers understand the context and importance of the contents.
• The language in the document is highly technical, addressing specific regulatory and legal references (e.g., 284.123(g) and 4(d) Rate Filing), which might be challenging for general public understanding without legal or domain-specific expertise.
• The document outlines specific procedures for intervention and protest without explaining the implications or potential outcomes of these actions, which might be important for public understanding.
• Contact information and resources are listed at the end of the document but could be more prominently featured or explained earlier for the benefit of readers new to these proceedings.