FR 2025-02934

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #2

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission received a request from MPH Elwood, LLC, to set new electricity prices starting April 16, 2025, and people have until March 7, 2025, to share their thoughts or objections. The link to more details is broken, and the document uses some confusing words without much explanation.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission announced that it received an initial rate filing from MPH Elwood, LLC, seeking market-based rate authorization and waivers. The application is to be effective starting April 16, 2025, and was filed on February 14, 2025. Interested parties have until 5 p.m. ET on March 7, 2025, to file interventions, protests, or responses in accordance with the Commission's regulations. The Commission encourages the use of eFiling and offers resources for public participation and inquiries.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 10075
Document #: 2025-02934
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 10075-10076

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document discusses a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) about a recent electric rate filing by MPH Elwood, LLC. This filing seeks permission for market-based rates starting from April 16, 2025. It was submitted on February 14, 2025, and stakeholders have until 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 7, 2025, to intervene, protest, or respond as per the Commission's guidelines.

Summary

FERC has received and is reviewing an initial rate filing from MPH Elwood, LLC. This filing requests market-based rate authorization, which allows a company to set its electricity rates based on current market conditions rather than fixed government tariffs. The notice encourages stakeholders to engage in the review process by submitting comments or interventions before the specified deadline. Public participation is highlighted, with FERC offering tools and resources to facilitate engagement.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several concerns and areas where the document could be more user-friendly:

  1. Hyperlink Accessibility: The document text contains a broken hyperlink. This could impede access to critical information for those wishing to investigate the details more thoroughly.

  2. Regulatory Clarity: The document references specific rules ("Rules 211, 214, or 206") without offering a straightforward explanation or links to these regulations. This lack of context might hinder understanding, especially for individuals unfamiliar with the regulatory framework.

  3. Terminology: Terms like "Market-Based Rate Authorization" are used without plain-language definitions. This may cause confusion for readers not versed in energy market terminology or regulatory language.

  4. Filing Process Explanation: While the document mentions the importance of interventions and protests, it does not delve into their implications or importance, potentially leaving readers unsure about the significance of these actions.

  5. Outcome Clarity: Once a filing, protest, or intervention is made, there is no insight into the subsequent process or potential outcomes, leaving stakeholders in the dark about what to expect.

Broad Public Impact

This document serves as an important notice for those involved in the energy sector, including consumers, companies, and professionals who monitor energy and regulatory developments. For the general public, the document emphasizes the opportunity to participate in regulatory proceedings, thus promoting transparency and community engagement in decisions impacting energy prices.

Stakeholder Impact

  • Consumers: Market-based rate authorization could lead to potentially more competitive electricity prices, affecting household energy bills positively or negatively depending on market conditions.
  • Energy Companies: For businesses within the sector, this filing sets a precedent and provides a potential pathway for more flexible pricing models going forward.
  • Community and Public Advocacy Groups: The document’s push for public participation aligns with interests in greater stakeholder involvement in regulatory processes, allowing these groups to voice concerns or support for market-based pricing.
  • Regulatory Professionals: Legal and regulatory professionals may find it necessary to interpret and navigate the nuances highlighted in the document, considering the absence of direct links or explanations.

While the notice provides a basic framework for public and stakeholder engagement, further clarification and resources could significantly enhance overall understanding and participation.

Issues

  • • The document text contains a broken hyperlink which disrupts access to key information: 'https:// (print page 10076) elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp'.

  • • The document mentions 'Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations' without providing explicit details or links to these regulations, which might be unclear to some readers.

  • • The term 'Market-Based Rate Authorization' is used without a clear explanation of what it entails, which could be confusing for those not familiar with regulatory or energy market terminologies.

  • • The filing process and associated deadlines for interventions or protests are mentioned, but the importance and implications of these actions are not explained in detail.

  • • There's no indication of the outcome or response once a person files to intervene, protest, or answers a complaint, creating potential ambiguity for involved parties.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 378
Sentences: 17
Entities: 41

Language

Nouns: 110
Verbs: 28
Adjectives: 16
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.37
Average Sentence Length:
22.24
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
18.05

Reading Time

about a minute or two