Overview
Title
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Zeeland, MI
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FAA fixed a mistake in a rule about sky zones over Zeeland, Michigan, because they wrote the wrong place letters. Now, they made sure the sky zones map to the right airport, so airplane guides will be correct by April 2025.
Summary AI
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) corrected a typographic error in a previously published final rule regarding airspace establishment at Zeeland, MI. Originally released in the Federal Register on December 13, 2024, this rule mistakenly included duplicate state identifiers, including an incorrect “SD” identifier. The corrected rule now accurately reflects that Zeeland, MI airspace should be associated with Ottawa Executive Airport, MI. This ensures that navigational data is accurate for implementation by April 17, 2025.
Abstract
This action corrects a final rule typographic error published in the Federal Register on December 13, 2024.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Document
The document in question is a correction notice from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that addresses a typographic error in a previously published rule concerning the establishment of Class E airspace in Zeeland, Michigan. This correction updates the legal reference to ensure it accurately links the airspace to Ottawa Executive Airport in Michigan, by removing an incorrect identifier that was mistakenly included. The correction is set to be effective on April 17, 2025.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document highlights some significant concerns, particularly in terms of clarity and transparency. Firstly, the correction notice mentions a duplicate and incorrect state identifier ("SD") in the initial rule publication, but does not elaborate on the specific implications of this error. Readers are left without a clear understanding of how this mistake might have affected aviation operations or stakeholders involved.
Additionally, the frequent references to Federal Register volumes and pages may be confusing to those unfamiliar with this system. This could make it challenging for a general audience to piece together the context or locate relevant documentation easily. Furthermore, while the document indicates that additional materials can be found on the regulations.gov website, it does not offer a direct link or specific FAA Docket number for easy access.
Impacts on the Public
For the general public, the correction of such a typographic error likely leaves little direct impact beyond ensuring the accuracy of aviation data, which contributes indirectly to safety and operational efficiency. The public relies on precise and correct airspace information for smooth aviation operations, ensuring confidence in travel logistics and safety.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders such as aviation professionals, airport authorities, and air traffic controllers, this correction can carry significant implications. Correct legal definitions and identifiers are crucial, as they are used in navigation systems to prevent errors in flight planning and airspace management. Incorrect identifiers could potentially lead to confusion or operational challenges in air traffic control, which could have been a critical issue if left unaddressed.
On another note, the lack of a detailed explanation on how stakeholders were involved in identifying or addressing this correction indicates limited public engagement. Increased transparency in such processes can bolster trust and allow stakeholders to play a more active role in regulatory oversight and corrections.
Overall, while the correction ensures accurate airspace management for the Zeeland, Michigan area, the overall communication could have been improved for greater clarity and engagement with the public and stakeholders.
Issues
• The document makes a correction to an earlier final rule but does not provide detailed information on the impacts or consequences of the original typo error aside from mentioning duplicate state identifiers.
• The summary briefly mentions the correction to a typographic error without explaining what specific effects, if any, this error had on operations or stakeholders.
• The document uses various references to Federal Register volumes and pages, which may be confusing for readers not familiar with these references.
• The document states that the rule and supporting materials can be accessed on 'www.regulations.gov' but does not provide a direct link or the specific FAA Docket number needed for retrieval.
• It is not immediately clear what specific correction has been implemented in the section titled 'Correction to Final Rule' in terms of its impact on stakeholders or operations.
• There is no mention of any public or stakeholder engagement used to identify or address the correction, which could enhance transparency.