FR 2025-02733

Overview

Title

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Scottsdale Research Institute

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Scottsdale Research Institute wants to make certain special substances for important scientific tests, and people can tell the big decision-makers what they think about it before April 21, 2025.

Summary AI

Scottsdale Research Institute has applied to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to become a bulk manufacturer of certain controlled substances. This registration is intended to support the production of these substances for clinical trials and research purposes. The public can submit comments or objections electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal by April 21, 2025. The DEA requires comments to be submitted online and will provide a tracking number to confirm submission.

Abstract

Scottsdale Research Institute, has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9731
Document #: 2025-02733
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9731-9732

AnalysisAI

The federal notice published by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) acknowledges the application of Scottsdale Research Institute for registration as a bulk manufacturer of certain controlled substances. The primary intention behind this registration is to facilitate the production of these substances for clinical trials and various research purposes. The public is invited to submit comments or objections to this application through an online portal, with a deadline of April 21, 2025.

Summary of the Document

The announcement serves as official notification regarding Scottsdale Research Institute's application to become a registered bulk manufacturer of certain controlled substances. While the document provides instructions for submitting public comments, it does not specify which specific substances are involved. This detail is crucial, as it could impact the document's relevance and effectiveness in informing stakeholders about potential changes in controlled substance production.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several notable issues arise from this notice. The absence of specific information regarding the controlled substances that Scottsdale Research Institute intends to produce is the most glaring omission. This lack of detail may leave stakeholders uncertain about the potential impact of this application's approval. Furthermore, the document does not discuss the potential production volume or scale of manufacturing, which are important factors in understanding the broader effects this registration might have, especially concerning supply and regulatory compliance.

Another issue revolves around the vague language used to describe the purpose of manufacturing these substances. The mention of "clinical trials and distribution to their customers for research purposes" provides little insight into the nature or scale of these activities. Additionally, there is no information on how the DEA will evaluate this application, leading to uncertainty about compliance and assessment criteria. The document also contains an awkward continuity issue in the summary section, which might confuse readers about where to find supplementary information.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

This notice holds potential implications both broadly and for specific stakeholders. On a general level, the public may have concerns regarding the increased production of controlled substances, especially without explicit details about safeguards, compliance measures, or oversight plans. For residents near production facilities, this could generate apprehensions about environmental or public health impacts.

For specific stakeholders, such as other pharmaceutical companies or research institutions, this application may introduce competitive concerns or opportunities, depending on the nature of the substances involved. These entities could be impacted by shifts in research dynamics or controlled substance availability. Existing manufacturers and research organizations might need to reassess their roles and strategies in light of Scottsdale Research Institute's potential new position in the market.

In conclusion, while the document succeeds in notifying the public of Scottsdale Research Institute's application, the lack of specific information significantly diminishes its effectiveness in providing a comprehensive understanding of the potential implications. The DEA could benefit from addressing these gaps to ensure that stakeholders can fully assess and respond to the proposed developments.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify which controlled substances Scottsdale Research Institute intends to manufacture, making the notice less informative for stakeholders.

  • • There is no information provided on the potential volume or scale of manufacturing, which could help assess the impact or risks associated with their activities.

  • • The document lacks details regarding the criteria used to evaluate the application, leaving uncertainty about aspects of compliance or assessment.

  • • The summary section uses an abrupt ending, with a sentence that starts with 'Refer to' followed by **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**, which could confuse the reader, suggesting there's a discontinuity or missing information.

  • • The phrasing 'to support clinical trials and distribution to their customers for research purposes' is vague and doesn't specify the types or details of research or clinical trials involved.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 373
Sentences: 15
Entities: 22

Language

Nouns: 116
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 17
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 18

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.49
Average Sentence Length:
24.87
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
20.39

Reading Time

about a minute or two