FR 2025-02677

Summary of the Document

The document originates from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and is published in the Federal Register. It addresses a correction to a previous error related to air quality regulations in the United States. Specifically, it updates a table in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 81. This table pertains to the air quality standards set for particulate matter known as PM2.5, with a focus on a specific region, San Joaquin Valley, California. The correction details are intended to resolve an editorial or technical mistake from the latest annual revision.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues are notable within this document. First, the document lacks an abstract that could provide readers with a quick overview of its content and purpose. Without this summary, readers may find it challenging to understand the context and significance of the correction at a glance.

Additionally, the document does not specify the exact nature of the error being corrected. Knowing what was incorrect about the previous entry and what the revised entry entails would be crucial for comprehending the potential impacts of this correction. Furthermore, the action associated with the rule change is not made clear in the metadata, leaving readers with insufficient information about the procedural aspects of the correction.

The reference to the billing code within the text also appears without explanation, adding to the confusion for those unfamiliar with regulatory documents.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, particularly those residing in or around San Joaquin Valley, California, this correction ensures the air quality data reflected in the regulations is accurate. Accurate information can reassure communities that the standards for air quality are based on correct data, which is crucial for health and environmental considerations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders such as environmental advocacy groups, local government agencies, and industries operating within the San Joaquin Valley may be more directly impacted. Environmental groups may see this as a reassurance that the region's air quality standards meet national requirements, potentially influencing their future advocacy efforts.

For local governments, accurate regulatory documents are vital for ensuring compliance and planning initiatives related to air quality improvement. An error correction might require reevaluation or adjustment of local air quality improvement strategies.

For businesses and industries, particularly those involved in activities that affect air quality, this correction may affect compliance obligations, potentially altering operational strategies to meet the revised standards.

Conclusion

The correction of an editorial or technical error in air quality regulations, while not uncommon, underscores the need for precision in regulatory documents that significantly affect environmental policies. Ensuring these documents are accurate is vital for maintaining public trust and effective governance. However, providing more context and clarity within such documents, including details of the corrections made, would enhance understanding and compliance among stakeholders.