FR 2025-02626

Overview

Title

Provo River Project-Rate Order No. WAPA-221

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The people in charge of electricity in a place called the Provo River Project decided to keep the way they figure out electricity prices mostly the same, but they made sure everything is up-to-date with contracts. The price plan is starting new in April 2025 and needs a big boss called FERC to say it's okay before it becomes final.

Summary AI

The Western Area Power Administration has approved a new provisional formula rate for the electric service of the Provo River Project, effective from April 1, 2025, through March 31, 2030. This new rate schedule, known as PR-3, will replace the existing PR-2 rate schedule, which expires in 2025. While the formula for the rate hasn't changed, it updates some contract references. The rate will remain provisional until the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) gives final approval, or it could be replaced sooner if another rate comes into effect.

Abstract

The formula rate for the Colorado River Storage Project Management Center's (CRSP MC) Provo River Project electric service has been confirmed, approved, and placed into effect on an interim basis (Provisional Formula Rate). The new formula rate under Rate Schedule PR-3 replaces the existing formula rate for these services, under Rate Schedule PR-2, which expires on March 31, 2025, and makes no changes to the existing formula rate other than updating associated contract references.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9625
Document #: 2025-02626
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9625-9627

AnalysisAI

The document titled "Provo River Project-Rate Order No. WAPA-221" announces the interim approval of a provisional formula rate for the Provo River Project's electric service. Issued by the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), it highlights the transition from an existing rate schedule (PR-2) set to expire on March 31, 2025, to a new rate schedule (PR-3) effective from April 1, 2025, through March 31, 2030. Although the formula calculation itself remains unchanged, the document notes updates to contract references involved with these services. Importantly, this provisional rate remains pending for final approval by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and could potentially be replaced by another rate sooner if circumstances necessitate.

General Summary

The core message of the document is about the implementation of a new provisional formula rate for the electric service associated with the Provo River Project. The rate initiative is mainly a replacement of administrative references and does not alter the existing formula calculations for the billing of electricity provided by CRSP MC – part of the wider Colorado River Storage Project managed by WAPA. The transition from PR-2 to PR-3 is portrayed as routine, with stipulations around its interim status pending regulatory approval from FERC.

Significant Issues or Concerns

  1. Complex Legal References: The document is laden with references to previous legal and order documents, such as delegation and redelegation orders, which may be challenging to follow for readers not accustomed to legal and bureaucratic jargon. This reliance on cross-referenced documents might cause confusion without an accessible method for lay audiences to navigate them.

  2. Technical Terminology: Concepts such as "Power Repayment Study," "Revenue Requirement," and "Surplus Marketable Energy" are extensively used but may not be familiar to general audiences, potentially causing misunderstandings or the need for additional explanation.

  3. Public Engagement: Despite following procedural norms for public notification, the document's approach may not effectively reach or engage the public or stakeholders who may not prioritize Federal Register notices. This could result in insufficient awareness or input from impacted parties.

Public Impact

Broad Impact: For the general public, this document highlights a necessary administrative update within the government to ensure continuity in the way electric services are billed under federal jurisdiction. While the update doesn't affect the pricing scheme directly, its procedural nature underscores the complexity inherent in navigating public energy administration.

Specific Stakeholders: For stakeholders like municipal utilities, public corporations, or cooperative agencies affected by the Provo River Project, the document contains critical information. The switch to PR-3 could mean varying interpretations of new contract references, which may indirectly affect billing procedures or long-term contract negotiations.

Positive and Negative Impacts

Positive: The continuity of the formula rate without fluctuations in policy ensures stability in billing and fosters trust in consistent long-term planning for both WAPA and its contracted service partners.

Negative: The interim nature indicates a lingering uncertainty until FERC gives final approval. This period of provisional status offers little room for stakeholder comment beyond the provided consultation period, potentially leading to disenfranchisement among smaller stakeholders who may feel sidelined in this bureaucratic process.

Overall, while the document signifies a procedural maintenance under WAPA's administration, it draws attention to the ongoing discourse between government policy frameworks and how they affect the country's energy infrastructure.

Issues

  • • The document heavily relies on cross-referenced delegation orders and previous rate orders, which might cause confusion for readers not familiar with these documents.

  • • The terminology used in the document such as 'Power Repayment Study,' 'Revenue Requirement,' and 'Surplus Marketable Energy' may not be easily understood by a layperson without background knowledge in energy regulations.

  • • The document contains numerous references to legal statutes and previous orders, which might overwhelm readers without advanced legal training.

  • • The approval process for the formula rate involves multiple steps and authorities, which can appear convoluted and might benefit from simplification or a flowchart to clarify the process.

  • • There is no clear explanation in simple terms of why a new rate order is necessary, apart from updating contract references.

  • • The extensive use of acronyms without consistent definitions throughout the document may result in misunderstandings, especially for new readers.

  • • The public notification process, although outlined, may not be sufficient for effectively engaging with the general public or stakeholders who are not closely monitoring such notices.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 3,258
Sentences: 120
Entities: 277

Language

Nouns: 1,183
Verbs: 249
Adjectives: 161
Adverbs: 31
Numbers: 174

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.98
Average Sentence Length:
27.15
Token Entropy:
5.61
Readability (ARI):
19.23

Reading Time

about 12 minutes