FR 2025-02613

Overview

Title

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Agriculture wants to check if people who want jobs with them are healthy enough, and they're asking everyone to share their thoughts on this by March 17, 2025. They want ideas on making their questions easier to answer without being annoying or difficult.

Summary AI

The Department of Agriculture has submitted a request for information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. They are asking for public comments on whether this information collection is necessary, and how to improve and minimize its burden. The specific document under review is the "Self Certification Medical Statement," which aids in determining if applicants for certain positions in the department meet the required medical and physical standards. Public comments will be considered if received by March 17, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9614
Document #: 2025-02613
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9614-9614

AnalysisAI

The document at hand is a notice from the Department of Agriculture, indicating their submission of a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval of an information collection requirement. This request falls under the jurisdiction of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a law established to minimize the burden of federal paperwork demands on individuals, businesses, and other entities. At its core, the document seeks public commentary regarding the necessity, utility, and impact of the proposed information collection, which focuses specifically on a "Self Certification Medical Statement." This statement is used to evaluate whether applicants for certain rigorous positions within the department meet the medical and physical fitness requirements.

General Summary of the Document

The notice calls for public opinion on several fronts: the necessity of the information collection for agency operations, the accuracy of estimated response burdens, the potential for enhancing the quality and clarity of the information collected, and ways to lessen the burden on respondents. It highlights a specific initiative under the Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service concerning job applicants' medical statements to ensure they are fit to undertake tasks that may involve tough working conditions and direct interaction with agricultural commodities. Comments will be accepted until March 17, 2025, and can be submitted via the specified online platform.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable issue is the absence of an abstract, which could aid readers in quickly grasping the essence of the notice. Additionally, while the document seeks comments, it might not provide enough specificity on the type of feedback desired, potentially resulting in responses that lack focus or fail to address key concerns.

The use of technical terms and references, such as specific legal codes, could be confusing for laypersons unfamiliar with governmental processes or specific regulations. The document mentions 5 CFR part 339 without adequate explanation, which could make it difficult for the general public to understand the full context of the medical information requests.

Furthermore, the description of respondents as simply "individuals" is vague. More detailed information about who is expected to respond would enable targeted feedback and more relevant responses to the call for comments.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the document represents a potential increase in transparency and consideration of public opinion in government processes. By inviting comments, the Department of Agriculture demonstrates a willingness to engage with the public, which can lead to more refined and effective policy implementation.

For specific stakeholders, such as applicants for positions within the Department of Agriculture's marketing and regulatory programs, this notice could have a direct impact. These individuals might face additional hoops to jump through, ensuring they meet medical and fitness standards necessary for their roles. On the one hand, this could be seen positively as maintaining high standards for health and safety; conversely, it might place an additional burden on applicants who must provide detailed medical information.

Affected businesses and organizations that have interactions with the Department of Agriculture may also see indirect impacts. Enhanced standards for employee fitness might lead to improved efficiency and quality in the services these entities receive from the department, although there might be temporary slowdowns during the implementation of such measures.

In essence, while the document outlines important compliance goals, it would benefit from greater clarity and specificity to maximize understanding and participation from diverse public stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document lacks an abstract, which may help in quickly understanding the purpose and scope of the notice.

  • • The information requested for comments on the information collection might not be specific enough, possibly leading to vague or general feedback.

  • • The terms and processes surrounding OMB review and the Paperwork Reduction Act might be unclear to the general public without prior knowledge or further explanation.

  • • The document references specific legal codes (5 CFR part 339) that may not be readily understood by all potential respondents without additional context or explanation.

  • • The frequency of responses is noted as 'On occasion,' which could be further clarified to specify an average or expected range of frequency.

  • • The description of respondents as 'Individuals' is very broad and could be more specific regarding who is likely to respond.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 638
Sentences: 22
Entities: 35

Language

Nouns: 213
Verbs: 60
Adjectives: 38
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.54
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
22.89

Reading Time

about 2 minutes