FR 2025-02588

Overview

Title

Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline; Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Columbia Gas Transmission wants to stop using an old gas well and its pipes in West Virginia, and people have until April 8, 2025, to tell the government if they agree or not, or if they have any questions.

Summary AI

On January 30, 2025, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to abandon certain facilities in West Virginia. This involves shutting down one injection/withdrawal well and associated pipelines at the Terra Alta Storage Field. The public can participate by filing protests, interventions, or comments by April 8, 2025. FERC encourages electronic submissions and offers assistance for those who need help with the process.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9540
Document #: 2025-02588
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9540-9541

AnalysisAI

On January 30, 2025, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to abandon a gas injection/withdrawal well and associated facilities at its Terra Alta Storage Field in West Virginia. The proposal has drawn attention due to its $775,000 estimated cost and the implications for those living in proximity to the facility. FERC, a body within the U.S. Department of Energy, oversees such decisions to ensure compliance with national energy laws and regulations.

Significance of the Document

This document is significant for several reasons. It outlines a step in regulatory oversight where a natural gas company seeks permission to abandon part of its infrastructure. The abandonment project, if approved, would entail financial expenditures and practical ramifications for the company, the local community, and stakeholders engaged with the Terra Alta Storage Field.

Issues and Concerns

Several issues stand out upon reviewing the document:

  1. Lack of Financial Transparency:
  2. The filing specifies an estimated cost of $775,000 but does not provide a detailed breakdown. Without this transparency, there could be concerns about potential wasteful spending or inefficiencies.

  3. Rationale and Impact:

  4. The document does not clearly explain why the abandonment of the well is necessary or what benefits or risks it might present to the local community or broader public. This absence of context leaves the public with unanswered questions about the decision-making process behind this significant financial investment.

  5. Complex Language:

  6. The language and references to regulatory sections are quite technical. This complexity may make it difficult for the average citizen to understand and engage with the process unless they have legal experience or resources for assistance.

  7. Accessibility of Information:

  8. Considering the document instructs interested parties to navigate FERC’s eLibrary and website for more information, individuals unfamiliar with these platforms may find it cumbersome to gather the data they need to make informed comments or interventions.

Broader Public Impact

Broadly, the document signifies governmental oversight in energy infrastructure management, affecting how resources are managed and earmarked for abandonment projects. The outcome could reflect on regional energy supply stability, local employment (through possible job reallocations or losses), and community relations depending on how the project is executed and communicated.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Local Community: Residents of Preston County, West Virginia, where the Terra Alta Storage Field is situated, may experience direct impacts ranging from changes in local employment opportunities to adjustments in community economic activities. Without adequate explanation of the project’s necessity, local stakeholders might be left with apprehensions regarding environmental, economic, or public health impacts.

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC: For Columbia Gas, the proceeding represents a formal step in ensuring compliance with federal regulations while managing its assets efficiently. However, failure to communicate openly and clearly could lead to skepticism or resistance from the public.

Environmental and Regulatory Bodies: Entities focused on environmental conservation may view such projects with scrutiny, given the potential ecological effects associated with disturbing gas storage sites. For FERC, facilitating public participation in reviewing this project aligns with its mission to ensure transparency and dialogue in energy regulation.

In conclusion, the document underlines a procedural step in energy management, raising questions about accountability, stakeholder engagement, and the oversight of vital natural resources. For those interested, it offers mechanisms to participate or express concerns, albeit within a framework that may seem daunting without clear guidance and straightforward communication.

Financial Assessment

The document under scrutiny announces a request by Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, for authorization to abandon certain facilities. This request entails financial implications, as indicated by the estimated cost of $775,000 for the project. This sum is intended to cover the abandonment of an injection/withdrawal well, a connecting pipeline, and related facilities at the Terra Alta Storage Field in Preston County, West Virginia.

Financial Summary

The primary financial reference in the document is the $775,000 estimated cost for the abandonment project. However, the document does not provide further details on how these funds will be allocated. This lack of detailed financial breakdown could raise concerns regarding transparency and the potential for inefficient use of funds. For instance, stakeholders interested in how the money will be spent might question if the amount is justified and whether it includes provisions for environmental restoration or other related costs.

Relation to Identified Issues

A key issue is the absence of specific information explaining why the abandonment is necessary and how these funds will be utilized effectively. This omission might lead to skepticism among stakeholders, as they might perceive the project as lacking clear justification or benefits. Furthermore, without a detailed financial breakdown, there is an inherent risk of wasteful spending, particularly if the funds are not scrutinized in terms of how they contribute to the project's goals.

Additionally, the document's complexity and technical language could prevent laypeople from fully understanding the financial implications. While reference is made to accessing further details through eLibrary and the FERC website, those unfamiliar with these platforms might find it challenging to retrieve the necessary information. This could curtail public engagement in financial scrutiny of the project.

Overall, while the document clearly states the estimated cost, further granularity in the financial allocation would enhance transparency and public trust in how the funds are to be utilized.

Issues

  • • The document specifies an estimated cost for the project of $775,000, but it does not provide a breakdown of how this estimated cost will be spent, which could indicate potential for wasteful spending.

  • • There is a lack of specific information regarding why the abandonment of the injection/withdrawal well is necessary and what benefits or impacts it may have, leading to potential concerns about the rationale behind the spending.

  • • The document uses technical legal language and references specific sections of regulations without explaining them in simpler terms, which may be overly complex and difficult for laypeople to understand.

  • • The document requires readers to access additional resources (eLibrary and FERC's website) for more information, which might be cumbersome for those who are not familiar with these systems.

  • • Instructions on how to file protests, interventions, and comments are embedded within lengthy paragraphs, making it difficult to locate specific guidance quickly.

  • • It is implied that late-filed motions to intervene may be denied unless good cause is shown, potentially discouraging public participation for those unfamiliar with legal processes or those discovering the issue late.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,887
Sentences: 68
Entities: 166

Language

Nouns: 566
Verbs: 170
Adjectives: 57
Adverbs: 37
Numbers: 109

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.03
Average Sentence Length:
27.75
Token Entropy:
5.42
Readability (ARI):
19.74

Reading Time

about 7 minutes