FR 2025-02579

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

FERC is looking at changes to electricity prices and rules from different companies, and people can say what they think about these changes on FERC's website before the end of February 2025.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) received several filings related to electric rate and tariff amendments. These include applications and notices of changes from various entities like Calistoga Resiliency Center, LLC, Michigan Electric Transmission Company, and others. The public has until specific dates in February 2025 to comment on these filings, which are accessible through FERC's online eLibrary system. FERC encourages electronic filing and offers support through its Office of Public Participation for those needing assistance in navigating the process.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9543
Document #: 2025-02579
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9543-9544

AnalysisAI

The document titled "Combined Notice of Filings #1" from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) primarily deals with a series of filings relating to electric rates and tariff amendments. It includes a list of various entities seeking to certify their status, amend tariffs, or address compliance issues with FERC's regulations. The public has a window in February 2025 to comment on these filings. The document provides docket numbers for each filing and assures accessibility through FERC's online eLibrary system.

General Summary

This notice serves as an announcement of numerous filings received by FERC. These filings involve applications and notices submitted by different energy companies and organizations, such as Calistoga Resiliency Center, LLC, and Michigan Electric Transmission Company. Each filing includes important details like docket numbers, descriptions of the filings, filing dates, and deadlines for public comments. These steps are crucial for ensuring regulatory compliance and managing amendments to existing electric rate tariffs.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document presents several challenges that could obscure its information for general audiences:

  • Lack of Financial Details: The document does not specify any financial amounts in the filings. This absence makes it difficult to assess potential financial implications or identify areas where wasteful spending might occur.

  • Urgency and Expedited Action: Certain filings are noted for requiring expedited actions without a clear explanation. This lack of transparency could raise concerns about favoritism or an unfair advantage without proper justification.

  • Complex Terminology: The consistent use of docket numbers and regulatory jargon, such as "§ 205(d) Rate Filing,” may be confusing for those unfamiliar with FERC processes. This issue is compounded by technical language and specific references that might be challenging for the general public to navigate.

  • Ambiguity in "Notice of Cancellation": The term "Notice of Cancellation" appears in the PJM Interconnection's filing but lacks sufficient context, which could lead to misunderstandings about its implications.

Impact on the Public

The document provides avenues for public participation, emphasizing the ability to submit comments on the filings. By encouraging electronic submissions, FERC facilitates wider public engagement. However, the technical nature of the document and the barriers created by regulatory terms may limit full participation from the general public, who might not have the expertise to interpret the implications of these filings accurately.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved or impacted by these filings, the document outlines critical steps for intervention and participation in proceedings. Entities like energy companies, regulators, and possibly affected communities have until designated comment dates to offer their insights or objections.

Stakeholders with knowledge of FERC processes will find the document straightforward and highly relevant as they consider how these changes affect their operations or regulatory compliance. On the downside, the lack of detailed explanations may hinder smaller entities or the public from grasping the full scope and potential consequences of these filings, emphasizing the importance of FERC's Office of Public Participation in assisting those needing further clarification or guidance.

In summary, while the document opens up important regulatory processes to public scrutiny and provides a structured framework for participation, its highly technical nature poses barriers that might limit its accessibility to a broader audience. By leveraging FERC's support resources, stakeholders can better navigate these complexities and engage effectively in the regulatory process.

Issues

  • • The document does not disclose any specific monetary amounts involved in the filings, making it impossible to identify potential wasteful spending directly within the text.

  • • There is no clear indication of why some amendment and tariff filings require expedited action as mentioned, which may be perceived as favoritism without proper justification.

  • • The use of docket numbers without context may be unclear to readers unfamiliar with FERC processes, making the document challenging to navigate for the general public.

  • • The document lists numerous entities and docket numbers without much explanation, which may make it difficult for stakeholders to quickly identify matters of concern relevant to them.

  • • The term 'Notice of Cancellation' in the context of PJM Interconnection's filing could benefit from further clarification to avoid misunderstanding on its implications.

  • • The document repeatedly uses technical language such as '§ 205(d) Rate Filing' and specific references like 'Att X, App 6', which might be overly complex for readers not versed in FERC regulations.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,836
Sentences: 117
Entities: 235

Language

Nouns: 666
Verbs: 61
Adjectives: 34
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 218

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.14
Average Sentence Length:
15.69
Token Entropy:
4.75
Readability (ARI):
17.89

Reading Time

about 6 minutes