Overview
Title
Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board looked at some secret papers about old civil rights cases. They decided it's okay to share most of the papers with the public, but a few will stay secret for now because the FBI and Justice Department asked to keep them hidden.
Summary AI
The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 679 pages of records related to a civil rights cold case. Of these, the Department of Justice and the FBI requested postponements for 562 pages. On January 10, 2025, the Review Board allowed 267 postponements, requested changes for 25, and decided to disclose 640 pages fully and 39 pages partially. They also approved four pending postponements from another incident. This decision follows the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018, which mandates the publication of such determinations in the Federal Register within 14 days.
Abstract
The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 679 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) related to a civil rights cold case incident to which the Review Board assigned the unique identifier 2023-002-001. NARA did not propose any postponements of disclosure. The Department of Justice and the FBI proposed 562 postponements of disclosure. On January 10, 2025, the Review Board approved 267 postponements, requested changes to 25 postponements, and determined that 640 pages in full and 39 pages in part should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. The Review Board also voted to approve the four postponements pending from incident 2023-002-007. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the Federal Register its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The recent document from the Federal Register outlines the decisions made by the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board regarding the disclosure of documents related to a civil rights cold case. In total, the board received 679 pages of records. The Department of Justice and the FBI proposed that 562 pages remain undisclosed for the time being. However, the Review Board took a closer look and decided to approve only 267 of these proposed postponements. They also found 640 pages fully appropriate for public release and chose to partially disclose an additional 39 pages. Furthermore, they concluded by approving four more pending postponements related to a different case.
From a general vantage point, the document highlights the board's responsibility under the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 to ensure timely publication of its determinations on the federal registry within a two-week period. Such transparency helps in maintaining public trust and accountability in governmental processes, especially concerning historical civil rights matters.
One significant concern highlighted by this notice is the large number of requested postponements. The Department of Justice and the FBI recommended postponements for a significant portion of the documents. This raises questions about the balance between protecting sensitive information and the public's right to know. Why were so many documents initially deemed unsuitable for disclosure, and what criteria were used by the board in their final determinations? These considerations are important for understanding and scrutinizing governmental transparency.
The broad impact of this document on the public is in its facilitation of access to historical records, which may offer insight into past civil rights incidents. Such access can educate and inform the public while potentially contributing to ongoing discussions about civil rights and justice. Moreover, the implementation of the disclosure process shines a light on the functioning of judicial and governmental agencies in addressing past injustices.
For specific stakeholders such as historians, researchers, and those invested in civil rights advocacy, the disclosure of these documents can provide valuable information. These stakeholders can analyze details that might lead to new understandings or reevaluations of historical events. On the other hand, families and communities directly impacted by the events related to these documents may find the disclosures either healing or distressing, depending on the nature of the information revealed. For governmental and investigative bodies, this process may affirm the integrity of their operations, or it could bring about scrutiny and push for further reform.
Overall, while the release of these cold case documents marks a positive step toward transparency, ongoing scrutiny will be essential in ensuring that postponements are used judiciously and that the promise of justice through transparency continues to be upheld.