Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The people in charge of energy rules got a lot of papers from different companies about changing prices for gas pipelines, and they're asking for thoughts from the public. If people want to say anything about these changes, they need to send in their comments by the deadline.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received multiple filings related to natural gas pipeline rate changes and compliance reports, which were submitted by various companies. These filings include proposals for rate adjustments, compliance with specific orders, and updated operating conditions, with effective dates mostly set for mid-2025. Interested parties wishing to participate in or contest these proceedings must submit their interventions or protests by the noted comment deadlines. The filings can be accessed through the Commission's eLibrary system, and additional support for the public is provided by the Office of Public Participation.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Register document focuses on several rate and compliance filings related to natural gas pipelines that have been submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These filings include requests for changes in rates, compliance with regulatory orders, and updates to operating conditions by various pipeline companies. The effective dates for these changes are primarily set for mid-2025, giving involved companies time to adjust their operations accordingly.
Summary
The document lists a comprehensive collection of submissions, distinguishing each by docket number, applicant name, and a brief description of the filing's purpose. While the document provides essential procedural details, such as filing dates and deadlines for public commentary, the overall presentation is administrative and technical in nature.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Complexity and Jargon: The document contains a significant amount of technical language, referencing specific regulatory orders and compliance standards like "Order No. 587-AA" and "NAESB 4.0." For individuals not familiar with FERC regulations, this jargon can be intimidating and might hinder understanding.
Lack of Clarity: There is limited explanation regarding the implications of these rate and compliance filings. General readers may find it challenging to comprehend the nature and impact of the proposals, potentially leading to misinterpretation or lack of informed participation.
Overwhelming Information: The document lists numerous docket and accession numbers without comprehensive context or explanation of their significance. This lack of context can make the document appear overwhelming, making it difficult for readers to discern relevant details.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the document could have significant implications for consumers of natural gas. Changes in pipeline rates might eventually translate into cost adjustments for end users. For the general public, the lack of understandable information could lead to disengagement, limiting effective public participation in regulatory discussions and decisions.
Impact on Stakeholders
Natural Gas Companies: For the applicants, these filings are essential for aligning with regulatory requirements and maintaining or adjusting economic operations. By participating and complying, these companies position themselves to operate legally and efficiently under the evolving regulatory landscape.
Regulatory Bodies: FERC's role in collating and reviewing these filings is crucial for ensuring compliance and protecting consumer interests. The document indicates a structured timeline for responding, suggesting a systematized oversight process.
Public and Consumer Advocacy Groups: Stakeholders aiming to represent consumer interests may find the document challenging to navigate due to its technical nature. However, it presents an opportunity to advocate for transparency and clarity in FERC communication to the public.
The FERC’s Office of Public Participation is noted as a resource for public assistance and engagement, signifying an understanding of the potential barriers to public involvement. This highlights the need for accessible information dissemination to foster meaningful participation, ensuring that public and stakeholder concerns are addressed in legislative processes.
Issues
• The document relies heavily on technical jargon and references to regulatory orders (e.g., Order No. 587-AA, NAESB 4.0) that may not be easily understood by the general public. This could limit meaningful public engagement.
• The document does not provide clear explanations or summaries of what the specific rate filings or compliance filings entail, which might be confusing to readers not familiar with FERC procedures.
• The document lists a large number of docket numbers and accession numbers without explanation of how they are relevant or what they represent, potentially making the information overwhelming and difficult to navigate.
• The repeated mention of 'compliance filing' and adoption of various compliance standards without elaboration might obscure the actual changes or impacts of these filings for stakeholders.
• The document uses bureaucratic language like 'eFiling', 'OPP', 'intervention', and 'protests' without providing context or definitions, which might hinder understanding for individuals not routinely dealing with FERC procedures.