Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The people in charge of the money system in the U.S. decided to keep asking banks some questions every few years to help them do their job better. They got one suggestion to add more things to these questions in the future and said they will think about it later.
Summary AI
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has approved extending the Supervisory and Regulatory Survey (FR 3052) for three more years without any changes. This survey collects information from financial institutions to help the Federal Reserve with its responsibilities, and participation is voluntary. The Board received one comment on the extension, which supported it and suggested adopting an international auditing standard and forming a group for future surveys. They have acknowledged this feedback and will consider it for future surveys.
Abstract
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) is adopting a proposal to extend for three years, without revision, the Supervisory and Regulatory Survey (FR 3052; OMB No. 7100-0322).
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document titled "Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB," published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, provides insights into the extension of the Supervisory and Regulatory Survey (FR 3052). This survey plays a pivotal role in collecting data from financial institutions to assist the Federal Reserve in fulfilling its supervisory and regulatory roles.
General Summary
The Board of Governors has decided to extend the Supervisory and Regulatory Survey (FR 3052) for an additional three years. This decision comes without any revisions to the existing survey format. The primary function of this survey is to gather information from a variety of financial institutions, helping the Federal Reserve execute its supervisory and regulatory duties effectively. Participation in this survey is voluntary, and the estimated response burden is fairly light, with an average response time of about 0.5 hours per participant.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document raises several important issues:
Lack of Cost Analysis: The document does not provide any details about the financial implications of extending this survey, which could lead to concerns about budget allocations or potential waste.
Voluntary Participation Concerns: While the survey is voluntary, the document fails to address how this might influence participation rates and the quality of the data collected. There is an inherent risk that limited participation could affect the representativeness and reliability of the survey findings.
Vague Implementation of Recommendations: A recommendation to incorporate international auditing standards and establish a collaborative group was acknowledged, yet the document does not outline any specific plans for how these suggestions will be integrated or assessed in the future.
Unclear Frequency and Content Adjustments: The document states that the survey's questions can change based on economic and legislative developments, but it does so without any detailed explanation, which creates ambiguity about when and how these changes might occur.
Estimated Response Time: An average response time of 0.5 hours is mentioned, but there is no detailed breakdown of how this estimate was reached, undercutting the ability to properly evaluate the realistic burden on respondents.
Data Confidentiality: The document does not touch upon the measures in place to ensure the confidentiality and security of the data collected, which could be a cause for concern among participants.
Public Impact
For the general public, the continuation of this survey may indicate ongoing oversight and regulation of financial institutions, potentially contributing to economic stability. However, without clearer communication on the benefits and secure handling of the gathered data, public trust might be compromised.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For financial institutions, the continuation of this survey provides a consistent structure for reporting to the Federal Reserve. However, the voluntary nature of the survey and its lack of updated revisions might affect institutions that hope for a more nuanced approach to regulatory reporting. Stakeholders advocating for higher standards may view this as a missed opportunity to integrate more international guidelines and collaborative efforts into the process.
In conclusion, while the extension of the FR 3052 survey reflects the Federal Reserve's commitment to oversight, it also highlights several areas where transparency and specificity could be improved, ultimately benefiting both the surveyed institutions and the broader regulatory landscape.
Issues
• The document does not specify any spending details, such as cost analysis or budget allocation for the continuation of the survey, which could be reviewed for potential waste.
• The document states that the survey is conducted on a voluntary basis without explaining how this affects participation rates or data quality.
• The document mentions a comment recommending international auditing standards and a collaborative working group for future surveys but does not specify how these recommendations will be considered or implemented.
• The language regarding the circumstances under which the frequency and content of survey questions change is vague and undefined.
• The estimated average response time of 0.5 hours is provided without any detailed breakdown of tasks or explanation of this estimate, making it difficult to assess its accuracy.
• The document does not address any measures for ensuring the confidentiality and security of data collected through the survey.