FR 2025-02328

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Waive the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF) for December 2024

Agencies

ELI5 AI

NYSE American wanted to change a special fee, but then decided not to go ahead with it after some thinking, even though the rule keepers were checking if it was okay.

Summary AI

NYSE American, LLC filed a proposal with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in November 2024 to change its Options Fee Schedule, specifically concerning the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF). The SEC published the proposed rule change in the Federal Register in December 2024. However, in January 2025, the SEC temporarily suspended this proposal and began proceedings to decide whether to approve or disapprove it. Subsequently, NYSE American withdrew the proposal later in January 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9173
Document #: 2025-02328
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9173-9173

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Federal Register concerning actions taken by NYSE American, LLC, a national securities exchange, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It involves a proposed rule change related to the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF) that was initially filed in November 2024, suspended in January 2025, and later withdrawn by NYSE American.

General Summary

In November 2024, NYSE American LLC filed a proposal with the SEC to modify its Options Fee Schedule, specifically impacting the Options Regulatory Fee. This rule change was intended to take immediate effect and was published for public comment in December 2024. However, by January 2025, the SEC had suspended the proposal, initiating a review to determine whether it should be approved or disapproved. Subsequently, NYSE American withdrew the proposal entirely just days after this suspension.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable issue is the lack of clarity regarding why NYSE American withdrew the proposed rule change. The document does not provide any reasoning or context behind the withdrawal, leaving interested parties in the dark about the motivations and potential implications of this action.

Additionally, while the document references multiple legal and regulatory provisions, such as "15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1)" and "17 CFR 240.19b-4," it does not explain these references in simple terms. This absence of explanation can make the document quite inaccessible to readers unfamiliar with securities regulation.

Moreover, the process steps, including the SEC's temporary suspension and the subsequent withdrawal of the proposal, are not fully elaborated. This lack of detail might confuse readers about the sequence of events and the regulatory mechanisms at play.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document might not seem immediately impactful. However, any changes to the Options Regulatory Fee could potentially affect anyone involved in options trading, even indirectly. The proposal's suspension and withdrawal could lead to uncertainty or maintain an existing status quo that traders were expecting to change.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved with NYSE American or those affected by the Options Regulatory Fee, such as traders and brokerage firms, the withdrawal of the proposed change may have significant implications. On the one hand, the withdrawal averts immediate changes that might have been challenging or unfavourable to some stakeholders. On the other hand, some stakeholders may have been anticipating the proposed changes, which could have provided financial or operational relief; thus, the withdrawal may prolong existing burdens.

In conclusion, the actions documented here reveal a layer of complexity embedded within the regulatory processes governing financial markets. While the document is procedural in nature, the ramifications of such withdrawals or suspensions are potentially large for those actively participating in the markets it governs. Transparency and clear communication from regulatory bodies and exchanges can help in understanding these impacts more thoroughly.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide a clear reason for the withdrawal of the proposed rule change by the NYSE American.

  • • There is a lack of detailed explanation on the impact of the temporary suspension instituted by the Commission on stakeholders, particularly those affected by the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF).

  • • The document uses regulatory references like '15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1)' and '17 CFR 240.19b-4' without providing plain language explanations, which may cause difficulty in understanding for readers not familiar with these references.

  • • The process involving the temporary suspension and subsequent withdrawal of the proposal is not clearly explained, which may lead to confusion about the sequence of events and motivations behind them.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 457
Sentences: 17
Entities: 54

Language

Nouns: 122
Verbs: 31
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 54

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.70
Average Sentence Length:
26.88
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
21.86

Reading Time

about a minute or two