FR 2025-02317

The document titled "UP Property 2, LLC; Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment," issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), outlines an Environmental Assessment (EA) regarding the proposal to surrender the exemption of the High Falls Project. This project, located on the Deep River in Moore County, North Carolina, involves the removal of a dam down to the riverbed, highlighting its potential environmental and regulatory impacts.

Overview of the Document

The notice serves as a formal communication from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission offering insights into the environmental consequences of the proposed project changes by UP Property 2, LLC. The Environmental Assessment aimed to evaluate whether removing the dam would result in significant negative impacts on the environment. The assessment concluded that the surrender of the exemption and the removal of the dam would not have substantial adverse effects on the environment. This conclusion is significant as it facilitates the progression of the proposal without necessitating a more comprehensive, resource-intensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues with this document is its reliance on regulatory citations, such as "18 CFR part 380," which may not be intuitive or easily digestible for individuals without a legal or regulatory background. Such references may hinder a general audience's ability to comprehend the document's implications quickly.

Moreover, the language used, such as "surrender the exemption," contains technical jargon. Without additional explanation, these terms might be perplexing to the average reader, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the nature and consequences of the proposed actions.

Public Impact

From a broader societal perspective, documents of this nature can significantly influence the public. The removal of a dam can have environmental, recreational, and economic ramifications. While the document concludes no significant adverse environmental consequences, such projects may alter local ecosystems and influence water flow, impacting fish habitats and aquatic life.

For residents and local businesses, there may be both beneficial and detrimental outcomes. Positive environmental changes can enhance local water quality and promote biodiversity. However, perceived negative impacts might include alterations to recreational areas, affecting tourism and local businesses reliant on such resources.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders such as local landowners, environmental groups, and recreational users may be directly affected by this decision. Landowners concerned about potential flooding or altered land conditions may need to address these concerns with FERC or engage in public participation opportunities provided by the Commission. On the other hand, environmental groups advocating for ecosystem restoration may view the removal of the dam positively as it can contribute to restoring natural river conditions.

Tribal members and other community stakeholders engaged in resource management and cultural preservation activities might have unique interests and should evaluate the EA carefully to ensure their concerns and interests are adequately represented and addressed.

In summary, while the notice conveys a structured and regulatory-compliant message about the proposed changes to the High Falls Project, it underscores the importance of clear communication and public engagement in regulatory processes. Such involvement ensures that the diverse interests and potential impacts on the community and environment are comprehensively considered and addressed.