FR 2025-02280

Overview

Title

Green Lake Water Power Company; Notice of Revised Procedural Schedule for Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Project Relicense

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Green Lake Water Power Company wants to keep using the river to make electricity, and some people are checking if it's okay for nature. They're taking a long time and changing their plan a lot to make sure everything is just right.

Summary AI

Green Lake Water Power Company has applied to continue operating the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project, which generates 425 kilowatts of power. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is reviewing this application and preparing an environmental assessment (EA) to understand the potential effects of renewing the project's license. The timeline for completing this assessment has been updated multiple times and may continue to change. Any inquiries about the procedure can be directed to Amanda Gill at the contact details provided.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 9080
Document #: 2025-02280
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 9080-9080

AnalysisAI

The document under review is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, part of the Energy Department, concerning the relicensing of the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project. Green Lake Water Power Company has applied to renew its license to operate this 425-kilowatt power project. The Commission is currently in the process of preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA), which aims to evaluate the potential effects of renewing the project's license.

Summary of the Document

The notice outlines the submission of a relicensing application by Green Lake Power and the ongoing development of an EA to assess environmental impacts. Initially, a schedule was set for completing the assessment, but it has been revised several times. The document indicates that further changes may occur as more information is considered.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The most notable concern is the repeated changes in the procedural schedule for completing the EA. This raises questions about potential inefficiencies or delays in the process, which are not explained within the document. Moreover, the notice lacks detailed information about the environmental impacts anticipated as part of this relicensing process. This absence of detail can challenge stakeholders and the public in forming a well-rounded understanding of the project's potential effects.

Another gap in the document is the absence of any discussion about budgetary considerations or financial transparency regarding the relicensing process. Without this information, evaluating the fiscal efficiency of the project becomes difficult. Furthermore, the notice does not mention stakeholder or public involvement opportunities, which could lead to concerns about transparency and the openness of the proceedings.

Impact on the Public

The potential impact of this notice on the general public is primarily environmental and procedural. The licensure of the hydroelectric project represents a continued commitment to renewable energy sources, which can contribute positively to local power grids and sustainability goals. However, members of the community may be frustrated by the apparent lack of transparency and detail concerning environmental and procedural steps. Delays in procedural schedules might also affect local energy strategies and community planning.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Green Lake Water Power Company is directly affected, as their ability to continue operations under a renewed license centers on the environmental assessment's findings and subsequent decisions. Transparent and efficient processing of this license is critical for them to maintain operational stability.

Environmental advocacy groups and local residents might be particularly interested in the EA's findings. A lack of explicit details could hinder these stakeholders from effectively advocating for or against particular aspects of the project. They may also be concerned about the potential environmental impacts if these are not thoroughly discussed or mitigated.

Overall, the document highlights an ongoing administrative and environmental evaluation process but leaves several critical questions unanswered in terms of efficiency, transparency, and public involvement.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide sufficient details about the budget or spending involved in the relicensing process, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no mention of stakeholders or public involvement opportunities, which could raise concerns about transparency and openness in the process.

  • • The document lacks specific information on the anticipated environmental impacts, which could make it difficult for stakeholders to provide informed input.

  • • The repetitive issuance of revised procedural schedules suggests potential inefficiencies or delays in the process without explanation.

  • • The notice does not clarify the reasons for the revisions in the procedural schedule.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 244
Sentences: 12
Entities: 27

Language

Nouns: 72
Verbs: 25
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.16
Average Sentence Length:
20.33
Token Entropy:
4.49
Readability (ARI):
11.67

Reading Time

less than a minute