FR 2025-02185

Overview

Title

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-America's Datahub Consortium

Agencies

ELI5 AI

America's Datahub Consortium is a group that works together on research projects, and they've told the government that they have some new members, like a university and some companies. They're open to even more people joining their team in the future to keep working on cool projects together.

Summary AI

America's Datahub Consortium (ADC), under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, has notified the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission about changes in its membership as of December 10, 2024. New members added to ADC include Optimal Solutions Group LLC, Radiance Technologies, Revelo LLC, and the University of Southern California. The group remains open to new members, and ADC plans to continue updating its membership list. The initial notification of ADC’s activity was filed in 2021, and previous updates were recorded in October 2024.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 8943
Document #: 2025-02185
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 8943-8943

AnalysisAI

America's Datahub Consortium (ADC) has recently provided updates concerning its membership changes, a move conducted under the framework of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. This procedural step was executed to notify the U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission regarding new additions within its ranks. As of December 10, 2024, ADC has welcomed Optimal Solutions Group LLC from Maryland, Radiance Technologies based in Alabama, Revelo LLC from College Park, MD, and the University of Southern California into its research consortium.

General Summary

The document serves as an official notice, addressing the procedural filing by ADC under specific legal provisions. These stipulations aim at protecting certain collaborative research activities from antitrust litigation by limiting recovery of damages under defined conditions. The notifications are not isolated events, as indicated by previous filings and notices disseminated by ADC, with its initial notification dating back to November 2021.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several concerns arise upon reviewing the document. Firstly, the specifics of membership changes lack elaboration. The document does not articulate how the new entities will enhance, alter, or contribute to the consortium's ongoing research projects. Secondly, it introduces America’s DataHub Consortium without much context regarding its purpose or the nature of its activities, making it difficult for a reader unfamiliar with the organization to grasp the significance of these changes. The legal language regarding the limitation of antitrust plaintiffs' recovery to actual damages might be challenging for those not versed in legalese. Furthermore, the acronym "ADC" is presented without prior definition, demanding context-based inference.

Public and Stakeholder Impact

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document demonstrates an example of compliance and transparency in cooperative research initiatives under U.S. law. However, the lack of detailed background information makes it difficult for an average reader to understand the larger implication or benefit of these membership changes. The complexity of regulatory language regarding antitrust protections might also be inaccessible to a lay audience, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the role and function of such consortia.

Impact on Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, including the new members, may experience a more direct impact. The addition of these organizations could foster increased collaboration, sharing of expertise, and innovation within research projects. However, absent explicit details about their roles and expectations, it's challenging to gauge the precise benefits or any possible friction introduced by these new alliances.

Overall, while the notice fulfills legal requirements, it leaves unanswered questions regarding operational implications and lacks elements that might help a broader audience appreciate its relevance fully. For stakeholders within the consortium, though, it affirms continued adherence to regulatory frameworks aimed at encouraging open memberships and fostering robust research collaboration.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide information on the specifics of changes in the membership of America's DataHub Consortium, nor how these changes might impact the group's activities.

  • • The document lacks detailed background information on America's DataHub Consortium and the nature of its research projects.

  • • There is no data or analysis provided to justify the inclusion of the new members or to demonstrate the expected benefits of these additions.

  • • The language in the notice about the antitrust plaintiffs' limitation to actual damages could be clearer for readers unfamiliar with legal proceedings.

  • • The acronym 'ADC' is introduced without explanation or definition in the text, requiring inference from context.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 324
Sentences: 12
Entities: 41

Language

Nouns: 110
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.79
Average Sentence Length:
27.00
Token Entropy:
4.73
Readability (ARI):
18.06

Reading Time

about a minute or two